689
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 36 points 5 days ago

Supremacists always appropriate things. Ok symbol, sacred numbers/symbols, clothing, words, deities, and twist it to exclude.

[-] prole 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Because fascists have no creativity.

As a general rule at least... I guess you can end up with a Leni Riefenstahl every now and then, but for the most part, if you were a good artist at the time in Germany, you were a target. And I guess one could call Josef Mengele "creative" if you remove all positive connotations from the word.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 4 days ago

I had to wiki her, and read about Blue Light and her first propaganda film. And her "how could we know." I guess for me it shows how easily anyone, dreamers and realists alike, can fall under the spell of skilled orators, especially the disenfranchised, wounded, left behind. Which is why I think it's important to leave pettiness and insults behind and beneath us, and rise to healing language and honesty, first with ourselves, and then extended to our kindred. Because we are them and they are us. We just mirror our better and worst selves to each other. If what we see as the worst in ourselves repel us and cause us to use unconscionable language and tactics, why would our kindred react differently?

I'm not talking about crimes against things or even necessarily institutions, but about crimes against humanity. The most poignant rl illustration I can refer to is the attempted genocide to the Jewish people, to now the near complete genocide of the Palestinian people. It was wrong then and it's wrong now.

[-] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago

Yep. There are still swastikas all over Korea because it's been associated with Buddhists for far longer than Hitler who appropriated it. Freaks out visiting westerners, though.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 10 points 4 days ago

It's not just Buddhists. Asatru, Norse/Germanic cultures, too. It ticks me off we have to give up things sacred to us because they've been misused. Aleister Crowley reveled in it and played it to the hilt, though. Yeats was not amused.

this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
689 points (100.0% liked)

Funny

9345 readers
747 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS