208
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
208 points (100.0% liked)
politics
25002 readers
2316 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Go ahead, then.
You made the claim that trump delayed the election results. You know you can't provide evidence because we both know you were lying.
Guess that makes you happy.
Libel.
https://web.mit.edu/healthyelections/www/final-reports/recounts-election-contests.html
Now, you're going to pretend that anything but immediate concession is moving the goalposts.
I'll remind you that it was never in contest that trump disputed the election results. Just your bullshit assertion that his disputes delayed the results of the 2020 elections.
Let's start with recounts, then move on to lawsuits.
There were two states that had recounts in 2020, Georgia and Wisconsin.
Georgia's recount concluded on November 19. The election was called 12 days prior, on November 7. It did not delay the election results.
Wisconsin's recount concluded on November 29. It also did not delay the election results.
Every single lawsuit listed by the source you provided:
Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Hobbs was filed on November 7, the same day the election was called for Biden. It clearly did not succeed in delaying the results. Here's a source for that. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=366
Arizona Republican Party v. Fontes was filed on November 12, 5 days after the election had been called. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=376
Ward v. Jackson was November 30. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=408
Stevenson v. Ducey was December 4. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=416
Burk v. Ducey, December 7. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=422
Wood v. Raffensperger, November 25. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=417
Trump v. Raffensperger, December 4. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=414
Pearson v. Kemp, November 25. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=401
Boland v. Raffensperger, November 30. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=403
King v. Whitmer, November 25. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=410
Johnson v. Benson III, November 26. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=411
Johnson v. Benson II, November 15. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=384
Costantino v. Detroit, November 9. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=367
Stokke v. Cegavske, Finally one that was filed before the election was called. This one was filed on November 5. There is nothing in the document you linked nor in this link: https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=352 that indicates in any way that any injunction of any sort was put in place to delay or cease any count. It did not delay the results.
Law v. Whitmer, November 17. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=387
Rodimer v. Gloria, November 19. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=390
Becker v. Cannizzaro, November 18. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=389
Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County Board of Elections I, November 12. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=378
Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County Board of Elections II, November 16. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=385
Ziccarelli v. Westmoreland County Board of Elections, November 18. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=391
Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Bucks County Bd. of Elections, November 9. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=369
In re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots of November 3, 2020 General Election V, November 10. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=383
Your source is factual and reliable. But it does not say what you falsely claim it does.
I called it. You’re moving the goalpost…
Here's your original assertion:
Your source does not support it, and I explained at length how.
You didn't even read one word of my reply.