208
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago

Which is better than progressives approval rating for a reason.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Got numbers for that or are you lying yet again?

[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah I got them from the same source as OPs “27%”

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago
[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago

The person that posted that number wasn’t you. How could you know their source unless you are using it as an alt account or lying?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

There's this thing on the internet called a search engine. I just looked up "democrats 27%" without the quotes.

Now where's your source?

[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's odd. I don't see a listed approval rating. You said it was lower and I would like to compare the numbers.

All that article tells me is that AIPAC can buy primary candidates.

[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago

I can’t understand the source for you

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

You don't even understand it for yourself. You just post links and assert that they support your false claims when they just don't. Bet you didn't even read it.

[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago

You want me to read it for you too?!

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

How about you read it for you? You clearly haven't yet.

Were you just posting links and expecting no one to read them and call you out on it?

[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yes, I've read the article. No, you haven't. Glad we're on the same page for once.

[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Behold, the height of centrist discourse. I'd ask if you have a source that actually supports your claim yet, but since your claim was bullshit, we both know you can't supply one.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

have a poll that proves that or you just pulled that info directly out of your rear like so much of what you say?

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
208 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25002 readers
2428 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS