208
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

"C'mon guys, just a little further to the right and we'll start winning! Ignore the last four times we lost by doing this and remember the one time it worked in 1992!"

[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 2 points 3 months ago

Democrats won the majority of elections since the 90s.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And only one candidate (Clinton) won by going to the right. Obama ran as a progressive (and governed as a centrist-technocrat) while Biden ran on a progressive platform (which he couldn't get passed because of Manchin and Sinema).

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

while Biden ran on a progressive platform (which he couldn’t get passed because of Manchin and Sinema).

Well, and because it was a pack of lies from the start.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I will give him credit for trying fairly hard to get his agenda through, especially in the first 2 years. He kept trying to find ways to get student loans forgiven without Congress, even when the courts repeatedly blocked him, and he did try to get some parts of Build Back Better that got cut in 2021 into the Inflation Reduction Act. He certainly tried harder than Obama to deliver on his platform.

He then abandoned the populous economic platform in 2024 and tried to pretend that letting most of his agenda get blocked by his own party was a huge accomplishment. He also tried to get to Trump's right on immigration, materially supported a genocide, and refused to step down despite clear cognitive issues, so all-in-all, 2024 was a bad campaign.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

He then abandoned the populous economic platform in 2024 and tried to pretend that letting most of his agenda get blocked by his own party was a huge accomplishment. He also tried to get to Trump’s right on immigration, materially supported a genocide, and refused to step down despite clear cognitive issues, so all-in-all, 2024 was a bad campaign.

Not as far as centrists are concerned. They got everything they wanted. They got their genocide. They got to betray immigrants and trans people, they got to have a presidential election without a primary, they're still getting their genocide, they're still getting republican immigration policy, and they're still getting anti-trans hate. Plus, they get to blame the left they spent the entire campaign alienating and saying they didn't need.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

and 10 other DINOS, machin and sinema were just the lightning rod for critcisim, for the ones that are afraid of getting primaried.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I once read a tweet that was something to the effect of, "The number of Democrats needed to pass meaningful legislation is always (N-1), where N=The Current Number of Democrats in Congress." I think about that a lot.

[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 2 points 3 months ago

Obama won because he appealed to centrists

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

He ran on a public healthcare option, bailing out homeowners, regulating banks, closing Gitmo, ending the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Saying he appealed to centrists is revisionist nonsense.

[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 2 points 3 months ago

Those are liberal policies not leftist. Saying Obama was a leftist is revisionist nonsense.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Obama won by running to Clinton's left.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

centrists have a 27% approval rating for a reason.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago

and governed as a centrist-technocrat

This is what got him elected and re-elected. Appealing to centrists

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Again, nonsense. He ran in 2008 in things like direct homeowner bailing outs, then passed things like HAMP, which tried (and failed) to inventivize lenders to refinance bad loans. Even in 2012, when he made less bold and specific promises, he made income inequality the center of his campaign. He always ran as progressive, not a centrist.

[-] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, if you say it enough times, maybe it'll become true. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
208 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25032 readers
2284 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS