916
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
916 points (100.0% liked)
News
28669 readers
4328 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
She’s an absolute legend. Thank you to her for her activism.
Brave as fuck. I'm terrified for her.
They were a nobody before, now they will be a champion of liberalism.
They probably went from nearly unemployable like the rest of us, to guaranteed a good job at a nonprofit or other company that is proudly pro trans rights. There's no shortage out there.
They just have to survive the judicial system and the penal system, with all the free legal representation coming their way they have a shot at avoiding any jail time, and who knows how the appeals will go after florida can't secure a settlement or guilty plea.
This is bravery, not a career step. The part about surviving of what's comming next is too scary. Trans people in jail are already being transported to prisons of their birth gender. She's risking a lot.
Right? The framing of that comment is very strange. Suspicious even.
Bravery or suicidal?
She told the cops ahead of time what the plan was. Did she expect it to go some other way?
She could've moved up to mass, i'm positive if she posted online someone would have taken her in to help her get a leg up in a part of the nation that isn't full of bigoted ignorant dumpy lovers, but she didn't.
I can't see Florida, land of the insane, to rule anything on her side. That leaves appellate court or the supreme court... and I don't see those going her way either.
In extreme times like these, bravery and suicidal go hand in hand. She wanted to make a point and she did, despite knowing what's going to happen. She was not interested in saving her ass, even though she could do it - she chose not to and deserves respect. Some people feel it's worth it to risk and perhaps even lose their lives for the chance the others will be better off for it. It's a completely different level of bravery than most people are capable of. Sometimes others get offended by that, because they don't understand it or feel like it sets a moral standard they cannot fulfill. The truth is, not everyone has to be this way. But let's at least appreciate it.
The article uses she/her pronouns, which seems a reasonable choice. Any particular reason you've gone with they/them?
Weird to assume she is unemployable too, tbh.
Sorry, have two in laws living with me who have been applying for jobs for 14 months without success. If they can't get jobs here in boston, i'm guessing florida is even worse.
Has nothing to do with her in particular, just the state of how fucked this nation is. Just like what I said originally.
i think they meant she was just another interchangeable employee "like the rest of us" rather than that she's particularly unemployable for whatever reason
That's also weird, though. "Like the rest of us" means nothing, plenty are employable, a vast majority are actually.
So, to assume they "probably went from unemployable" to winning the job lottery with a nonprofit is certainly a take.
I think (though i'm not certain) it was hyperbole. Emphasizing that the median resume would look unemployable to, like, a high paying consulting firm, like the sort that does work in DC.
I understand what you're saying and I'm not certain either.
But, given that the context is a response to concern, it makes it sound like they're suggesting that she's gunning for the outcome. Like "don't worry about them they're all setup now." A nobody who is now a champion of liberalism.
It just reads weird. Maybe they are just an ernest doomer who believes nobody is employable, but also thinks that everything will work out here. Stranger things have happened. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You know, it doesn't hurt to ask me instead of insinuating shit.
Sorry, have two in laws living with me who have been applying for jobs for 14 months without success. If they can’t get jobs here in boston, i’m guessing florida is even worse.
Has nothing to do with her in particular, just the state of how fucked this nation is. Just like what I said originally.
Some people are gender abolitionists and prefer they/them for anyone who doesn't specifically preclude they/them.
I dunno, still seems like misgendering someone, just with a different reason for doing so.
well yes, gender abolitionists misgender 99% of the population intentionally. That is the philosophy behind gender abolitionism. You can't break an omelette without eating eggs or something idk.
Yeah, i'm not that deep into gender politics. I was just talking about somebody I don't know, have never spoken to, have never met, and i've been relying on OP's news article as my source of truth for all information about her.
She made the choice to be where she is. Here's hoping she has an actual plan and she's not just victim #1 like everyone replying to me is implying.
If she was just using the restroom without sending out a press release ahead of time so that cops would be there this would almost certainly not have happened. I just don't know what this is supposed to accomplish in florida, land of the batshit insane people, especially with everything else bombarding us in the news. I get and agree with the desire to change things back to sanity, but I also know that my opinion is worth about as much as anyone on here.
They is gender neutral I thought and completely valid when talking about a third person regardless of their gender.
My understanding, and I'm by no means an expert, is that they/them would be used for an unknown gender, or for someone that has chosen those as their preferred pronouns. But in this case, the article and discussion is about a woman, so I think she/her would be the preferred choice.
Using they when you aren't specifying is fine and any indication otherwise is just virtue signaling. If someone used they despite knowing I use he/him because they don't know me well, regardless of whether or not it's stated, it's not an insult.
You aren't much more virtuous for using someone's preferred gender just as you shouldn't be demonized for not knowing someone doesn't use "traditional" gender ideology.
Absolutely, and I think jumping on people for making honest mistakes doesn't help anyone, as with most things it's the intention that's key. In this particular case though, I don't think there was too much ambiguity, and she/her seems to me like the safer bet.