263
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago

Per capita means it's adjusted for the population. Both China and India are large polluters but they are the two most populated countries in the world.

[-] JoeDyrt@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, we are small compared to them. But we are doing very well! This article is full of numbers without sources, making it an opinion piece.

Here’s something I can agree with:: (translated by google)

“ It is not only the limits of our planet that are exceeded, so is our economic model”, and

“… the only way to curb the looting and deadly destruction of our resources by the most greedy among us is to impose severe and ambitious regulatory constraints on them”

[-] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

I don't think you're getting it.

If Canada has 10 people and 6 of them are heroin addicts, and China has 1000 people and 60 of them are heroin addicts, then even though China has 10 times as many addicts they're doing a better job curbing addiction since only 6% rather than 60% of people are addicted.

[-] JoeDyrt@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I understand percentages. But in your example of addicts, it’s the number of people that counts in my book, not whether or percentage is lower. I also understand that more people, pollute more, absolutely. So to think that our small population needs to make a significant effort to reduce pollution , which is absolute, is a guilt reaction.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

The only logical way to compare countries' climate progress is per capita....

[-] JoeDyrt@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

It is certainly one way to compare. But in terms of global change, absolute numbers must be considered. No matter hours many people there are, we all breathe the same air. With more people in the area, there’s more pollutants in the air, whether it’s per capita or not. So while it may be logical to compare per capita, it’s not really the practical reality.

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
263 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9385 readers
1037 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS