236
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Now how in the hell is female sterilization not 100%?

[-] vfsh 11 points 5 days ago

Even after tubal litigation it's possible to still get pregnant if the fallopian tubes grow back together or if another tube/path forms. It's somewhat rare (0.5% of women who have had the procedure could get pregnant again)

[-] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 7 points 5 days ago

Isn't there a chance vasectomies don't take either?

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

It's a lot easier to double check in men.

[-] legion02@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

It's almost 100% because "proper usage" includes periodic checks.

But the same thing can happen with vasectomies so why isn't it showing anything there?

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Vasectomies are a lot easier to double check. A woman released 1 egg a month. A man released a LOT of swimmers every shot. Go in a cup and check for swimmers.

[-] Walk_blesseD 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah sure but that's not what sterilisation means. To be sterile means you're not making any gametes whatsoever, which typically means a complete removal of the gonads (ie an oophrectomy or orchidectomy). Otherwise you're not sterile, you're just infertile.

[-] str82L@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Guessing it's more female "sterilization"

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

I remember hearing that in rare cases, getting their tubes tied can actually heal.

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
236 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

2434 readers
320 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS