200
submitted 1 month ago by NickwithaC@lemmy.world to c/lgbtq_plus
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

There is some degree of distinction, I'd say. Bisexuality is attraction defined by the male/female binary, pansexuality is attraction regardless of gender. A person can be bisexual and attracted to cis men and cis women, but not pansexual if they aren't attracted to trans or agendered folks.

Granted, a lot of people who say they're bisexual are probably actually pansexual, but stick with the label that is more widely used and understood out of convenience.

[-] FweliXOX@lemy.lol 3 points 4 weeks ago

Granted, a lot of people who say they’re bisexual are probably actually pansexual, but stick with the label that is more widely used and understood out of convenience.

Yeah It's easier this way

[-] itslilith 2 points 4 weeks ago

That is not true, and never has been. The dichotomy described by bi in bisexual isn't male/female, it's homo/heterosexual. Pansexual is a subcategory of bisexual, emphasizing that one is attracted to all genders (or regardless of gender), not just a subset of them, equally. Whereas a bisexual might have varying levels of attentions to different genders

[-] amelore@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Historic definitions only matter in historic text.
The currently popular definitions are "attraction to your own and different genders" and "attraction regardless of gender".

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
200 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

3311 readers
119 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ada