879
Why I recommend against Brave.
(thelibre.news)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
879 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
68348 readers
2784 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My take: We can have an open source browser. No resources are required. We don't need ads to view content we make. There is no need for a megacorp or any entity taking money and controlling us.
Most browsers are already open source. They're all funded by advertising (except Safari which is a whole other problem).
Are you planning to imagine it into existence?
When you find one that has some sort of sustainable model that isn't advertising, please let me know. I'll be all over it.
Okay are you ready?
The model:
I don't think you understand. It would take you time to do that. A whole lot of time. Probably thousands of hours. Time is what's known as a "resource".
I understood perfectly, your claim is that it takes advertisement. Not time. And nobody has said it doesn't take time.
You very clearly did not and still do not.
Somehow you managed to gloss over the only point of my statement while also simultaneously fabricating things that I never said anything about.
You said "no resources are required". As I've just finished mentioning, time is a resource.