795
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Now we can yell at one of america's most mediocre presidents, actors, and movie producers.

Edit: as somebody pointed out he's not a director, he's a movie producer and actor per IMDB

[-] teejay@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Did I stutter? Obama squandered a huge mandate. I'm not saying he's a bad president like trump or bush, just a mediocre one, who could have done more but never rose to the moment. He also won the dem primary by poisoning the well against clinton which was a component of her 2016 loss.

And look at fucking Carter, spent his post presidency helping people.

Obama spent his whole post president career jacking off and chumming up with a bunch of tv celebrities. He's a mediocre president whose smug charisma presaged trumps smug charisma. Why live in denial?

[-] elatedCatfish@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Say what you want, but that dude fixed up a lot of America after the recession. So many cities and towns were fixed up and modernized due to his stimulus bills. And Obamacare is great - my wife would quite literally have died without it. Legalized gay marriage too and made the order that killed Osama bin Laden.

He’s pretty dope in my book.

Also, screw the Clinton’s and their Epstein-buddy asses.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If you hate Hillary Clinton, Obama also didn't make any effort to push her away from power as well given his choice for secretary of state.

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's not hard to be better then the Republicans

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I wonder why you're getting down voted. Obama led us directly to trump.

[-] afronaut@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 month ago

It’s one thing to claim racist bigots voted for Trump as a retaliation to the Obama administration. It’s another thing to claim it’s Obama’s fault that we got Trump.

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I don't think that's the argument being made. I can't speak for OP but, Obama was objectively a mediocre president.

He was a wall street loving centrist democratic politician.

He campaigned on change and then he bailed out the big banks when the shit hit the fan. Sure, he had some redeeming policies. (ACA and such)

However, this does not detract from the fact that he created no tangible change to the status quo. His shortcomings led directly to the rise of the same rightwing populism that's decimating government institutions today.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In his very short time of having a power over the Congress he achieved something that nobody thought possible. Against the wishes and the will of majority of Americans he gave tens of millions of them an access to health care, an access that they weren't able to get before, and will not be able to get after his legacy will be dismantled in a couple if months. It took all of his momentum, all the political power to do.
For some reason you think that America is capable of some change to the better, but you people are so deep in the conservative mindset, it takes the best momentum of the century to achieve a singular good thing.
And don't blame it on Obama or Democratic party, like you love doing so much, you are in control of your country's trajectory (well, until Trump will go full Putin on your ass). And you collectively chose whatever it is around you right now.

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I gave him credit for the affordable care act in my previous comment. I weighed it against his other shortcomings.

Still mediocre.

Apparently I have a conservative mindset for thinking Obama could have done much more with the power he had.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You didn't read my comment. You skimmed it for buzzwords you could react to.

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I read the narrative you were trying to convey. He did a good thing giving protections against healthcare availability.

Why does that remove him from mediocrity?

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You certainly did not. I chose to assume you just aren't paying attention enough, and just talk to whatever you think people are saying to you instead or actually reading the text. Otherwise that will mean the level of literacy we're working with is below zero, and I refuse to assume that, because in this case what are we even doing here.

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You said he "gave people access to healthcare" I agreed.

What else is there to engage with in your comment?

Assist me in understanding.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wait, seriously? Like, seriously, you're not joking? You really can't get the point from the original comment? You have read it and that was your understanding? Be honest, if not with me than with yourself, did you really read it, or just pretended to read and now digging your heels?

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Seriously, engage with his whole presidency. How would you rate his performance in it's totality?

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That...wasn't a point of my point

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Your point was that he got people health care coverage that otherwise wouldn't have been covered. I agreed with that point.

My point is that his presidency led us to trump.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

And my point was outlined in the comment you refuse to read.

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Ok, this isn't going anywhere.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

If it makes you feel any better I'm lost as well since the points they made in their attempted speech is just incorrect.

From 2000 through 2008, majorities ranging from 54% to 69% believed the federal government should ensure universal coverage in the U.S. (link)

The rest is bizarre word ramblings, "he achieved something that nobody thought possible", "his legacy will be dismantled".

It's kinda interesting, like he's specifically blaming you for hurting Obama's reputation and the country at large... Not that people in charge should be held accountable or have some sort of standard for what they campaign for. I'm happy for the people who benefited from ACA, but plenty people still don't and I imagine a lot of people don't realize you are fined if you're uninsured because of the act. Reminds me of being penalized for being homeless.

In other words, unless the insurance premiums exceed 8 percent of your income, you're a religious objector, a taxpayer with income below the tax-filing threshold, or a member of an Indian tribe, you're required to have insurance. That is, unless you'd rather pay the penalty, which is enforced through the tax code system.

It's that same fucking shtick with the whole student loan debacle. Keep the current profit generating system in place and pass laws and subsidies to help prop it up and stay as lucrative as possible. Any actual awareness or targeting of the greed is completely swept under the rug, so it's hard for me to get excited about this one step forward-two steps back bullshit. Especially when there's already so many perfectly acceptable examples around the world to learn and develop functional systems from.

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It absolutely made me feel better. Thank you.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, it was one-sided conversation from the beginning. And only you had the power to change it, all this time.

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Do you have any positions or is glazing Obama the extent of it?

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

At this point it's not even funny. Do you do this with every conversations in your life, or did I get lucky? Do you understand the theory of mind? Do you understand that you actually need to listen to the person when you talk, and not just invent what you feel they might say, and then argue with that for some reason?

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You got lucky. I'm understanding how vacuous your argument is and, it's making me curious if you have any beliefs.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Him being mid core makes him the best president in my life time

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Well, besides him I was alive for Reagan, Bush Sr, Clinton, Bush jr, Trump and Biden. Clinton had an easy presidency and yet did nothing to undo the damage caused by Reagan and Bindens brain turned to mush before our eyes. And the republican were well, Republicans

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] prole 2 points 1 month ago

It kind of is, but not in the reason they're thinking... But Obama mocking Trump at that White House Correspondents Dinner is said to have been a major impetus for Trump's 2016 campaign.

[-] afronaut@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

This is what I find interesting about the framing of blame.

It was “Obama’s fault” for cheekily responding to Trump’s racist Birther Movement that he was from Africa, with a clip from Lion King?

This is the racist undertone that a lot of people pick up on when they blame Obama for ‘2025 Hitler’. You forget there were effigies of Obama being lynched outside the White House. Republicans initiated a specific anti-Obama obstructionism policy during his administration. All of this uncooperative behavior was because he was black. Claiming Obama didn’t do enough to appeal to the fascists who weren’t going to work with him on policy anyway is giving a pass to fascists.

[-] prole 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wow, way to completely misrepresent what I said.

Where did I say anything was "Obama's fault"? In fact, I was clarifying what the person above me said... I would never use those words.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Its the same american goldfish memory that lead us to trump 2.0. People forget how inneffective Obama was at fighting right wing narratives and how inneffective he was at pushing for the policies he campaigned on.

Over time people's memories of Obama have been more nostalgia for the times rather than an honest assessment of his actions. People forget that if he had given half the effort to shutting down guantamano bay that trump has to destroying the department of education we'd be looking at a very different calculus of executive power.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Over time people’s memories of Obama have been more nostalgia for the times rather than an honest assessment of his actions.

Hell, at this point I've seen people being kind of nostalgic even about Bush...

[-] elatedCatfish@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

If you mean Trump was America’s revenge for having a non-white president, then sure

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

No, I'm speaking directly to his policy decisions and his inability/unwillingness to protect the American people from corporate greed.

[-] prole 3 points 1 month ago

Nobody in the US ever calls the President a "director."

Nice.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Sorry, it looks like he's a movie producer and actor not a director. I'll update it. I thought he had a more involved role

https://m.imdb.com/name/nm1682433/

this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
795 points (100.0% liked)

News

28981 readers
3986 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS