136
submitted 2 weeks ago by ladel@feddit.uk to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Even with the caveats about limited data and untangling causation and correlation, the statistics are striking: the first year of a scheme in Wales where the speed limit on urban roads was lowered to 20mph resulted in about 100 fewer people killed or seriously injured.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mbirth@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

I’m all for survival of the fittest. If people are too stupid to stay on the pavement, it’s on them. Why let drivers suffer to protect those idiots that blindly run into traffic?

Maybe we should ban ALL cars to get traffic related injuries to 0… 🤦‍♂️

[-] Yearly@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago
[-] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

I'd vote for that without hesitation

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] Naich@lemmings.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Your last sentence is the only one that isn't idiotic.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

That’s not the story of evolution! Read your Darwin! There’s like two pages on competition. Darwin, page after page after page is marveling at: oh my gosh, look at how species are collaborating and cooperating with one another for mutual survival!

https://youtu.be/rRWzOdUiqQE?t=1484

[-] j4yt33@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Thinking about the absolute inability of the average Brit to drive like a sane person... we should

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

haha yeah, why should we prevent deaths?

so like, would you just accept your entire family being shot as the natural way of things? if i throw you off a cliff that's just.. fine?

[-] mbirth@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Shooting someone or throwing someone off a cliff is a deliberate act to hurt/kill someone else. No driver wants to kill someone. (Well, apart from these extremists that occasionally drive into German Christmas markets…)

People mindlessly walking into traffic, because that funny video on Instagram is more important than watching their surroundings, they are the problem.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Higher speeds can cause drivers to lose control of their cars. People are killed on the side walks by drunk or speeding drivers frequently. Instead of blame shifting we should be taking steps to make the whole system safer.

[-] mbirth@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

If these drivers don’t obey the rules now, what makes you think they will obey them if you lower the speed limit?

And you don’t just lose control of your car at 30mph or even 50. Especially not in today’s cars with all their safety features.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

They don't have to lose full control. They could be following too closely and swerve onto the sidewalk to avoid a collision with a car and end up striking a pedestrian.

Speeders will stick out even more making them easier to spot in traffic. The reduced speed limit should also be accompanied by lane narrowing, speed humps, and other traffic calming techniques.

[-] mbirth@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

They don’t have to lose full control. They could be following too closely and swerve onto the sidewalk to avoid a collision with a car and end up striking a pedestrian.

This is a matter of the human factor - and you can never make that disappear. There will always be the odd idiot driver.

The reduced speed limit should also be accompanied by lane narrowing, speed humps, and other traffic calming techniques.

This is totally fine for housing areas, but definitely not for through-roads. There's no one-for-all solution in the same way our bodies don't have only one size of blood vessel.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The reduced speed limit should come with traffic calming relative to the speed limit. If a through road has a 20 MPH zone that area should have lane narrowing and at least raised crossings.

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
136 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4654 readers
113 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS