1178
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned Donald Trump and Elon Musk at a packed Arizona rally, accusing them of harming working-class Americans and promoting oligarchy.

Sanders denounced corporate CEOs as “major criminals” exploiting workers, while Ocasio-Cortez called for stronger Democratic leadership.

Rallygoers urged Ocasio-Cortez to challenge Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer after he supported a Republican funding bill.

The rally, part of Sanders' “Stop Oligarchy” tour, follows criticism of the Democratic Party’s weak response to Trump’s agenda and features further events in Colorado and Arizona.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Abstracted@lemm.ee 127 points 4 days ago

I wish you Americans would deal with this crap before I end up getting drafted to defend my country from the orange porcine dementia patient.

[-] tingly@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago

What do you suggest Americans do? Say someone is a working class American who didn’t vote for Trump. They can barely make ends meet and have no power or political sway. What does that person do? I’m not trying to be funny, I’m simply interested in your take and perspective as a non-American.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 35 points 4 days ago

I saw something recently that was talking about how individualism has led us to this situation. Everyone is thinking what they can do. We lost our collectivist spirit. We don't think about what we can do.

An individual has essentially no power. A group does. We need to get better at organizing. This is made hard because we are so separated from each other, driving individually to work, then back home, largely to houses where you don't interact with anyone else. We have basically no third places anymore where you'd typically organize. This situation was designed, and it's going to be hard to get out of, but we need to get better at forming groups and organizing.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This situation was designed, and it’s going to be hard to get out of, but we need to get better at forming groups and organizing.

Nothing can be fixed until it's understood to be a problem, and AOC from her stump speeches and emails seems to at least recognize the problem you're pointing that American systems are essentially "massively scaled up isolation from others".

Rugged individualism has failed us. It's going to take a reclamation of collectivism to fix our problems.

[-] tischbier@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

Great point. I’d argue that an extension of individualism is consumption.

What was the majority positive response to Luigi? Consumption.

People asked where to buy stickers and T-shirts. T-shirts.

[-] SkyeStarfall 18 points 4 days ago

They are powerless if everyone stops giving them power

The country is nothing without its workers

Of 10-20% of the population actively protested and actively tried to halt any functioning of society, you'd be surprised at how much you could get done. A that large mass of people is absolutely hell to control and subdue, and they certainly cannot arrest even a significant fraction of them. If the threat of protests of that scale were real every time they tried some fuckery, they would give in very quickly

The problem is that almost everyone thinks like you say, "what am I to do? I'm powerless", and give up before even trying

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'd love leaderless movements to have a better track record than they do, but the reality is that I think they fail much more often than they succeed in this country.

People can't just quit their jobs and occupy wall street forever.

[-] SkyeStarfall 2 points 4 days ago

I am aware it's difficult, but my point was that you aren't powerless

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As an unconnected individual with a middling net worth, you are powerless in this system. Whole movements of people are powerless. The only way this could possibly work is with the numbers and probably a leader organizing it.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

What are you talking about? We modernize what our forefathers did. Open a cryptowallet and ask France for help. The organizing is there if you are looking.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

And while we’re at it, why don’t people in China have the freedom to speak out against their government and not have censorship? Maybe if they all just got together in a big public square and really protested, I bet that would end really well.

[-] SkyeStarfall 11 points 4 days ago

I mean, if they all did it, it absolutely would make shit happen

The whole issue stems from most people wanting to just keep their heads down

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

(The parent commenter was making a Tiananmen Square Massacre reference.)

[-] SkyeStarfall 2 points 4 days ago
[-] Comtief@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

China never really had functioning democracy to begin with, so this comparison doesn't really apply. The point is to rise up before it gets as bad as in China.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Also thought of mentioning Hong Kong. Might be an even better example actually.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

People in numbers have ALL the power. I know Americans have been trained for defeatism, but look at what protest, resistance, and strikes can do overseas.

[-] witten@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

If you have any spare time, even half an hour here or there, go to protests. Connect with like-minded folks.

[-] Warehouse@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

What do you suggest Americans do?

You'd know more than someone outside of the US.

[-] tingly@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I never said I was American. I asked a hypothetical question. I was interested in a non-American’s thoughts.

[-] match@pawb.social 1 points 3 days ago

we are less free to say it than someone outside of the US

[-] zane@infosec.pub 13 points 4 days ago

Face it. Your blaming dirt farming peasants that John the bastard is going to crusade your lands.

There's literally nothing we can do about it besides die as well in most cases.

[-] SkyeStarfall 4 points 4 days ago

So instead of fighting now you're just going to allow yourself to get drafted later? How is that in any way preferable

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

The British empire was brought to its knees by normal patriots to form the country you're making excuses not to defend. Coward.

[-] djsoren19 14 points 4 days ago

That is such a gross and fundamental misunderstanding of the Revolutionary War it's almost comical. Probably most important to note is that the Revolution was bankrolled by U.S. oligarchs, and we received a lot of help.

[-] silverlose@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago

That sounds like Russian propaganda.

While not that untrue, it’s a pretty bleak interpretation of history.

You could argue the founding fathers were oligarchs but remember… they toppled a monarchy. Doesn’t get more autocratic than that.

You could also imagine some “oligarchs” could see that they benefit from a more equal society.

At the end of the day, the founding fathers clearly support rebellion. Say what you will about them but they were not hypocrites. From the Declaration of Independence:

“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it”

Rebellion is your duty.

[-] dilroopgill@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

our reality is pretty bleak lol

[-] djsoren19 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Say what you will about them but they were not hypocrites

Sorry, you're saying the people who were committed to making a Land of the Free that excluded blacks and women weren't hypocrites? The Founding Fathers are some of the biggest fucking hypocrites of all time.

The only thing they hated is that they couldn't be the British aristocracy. They absolutely were oligarchs and the vast, vast majority did not due it out of noble reasons. They did it because they wanted more profits.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 4 days ago

The Founding Fathers are some of the biggest fucking hypocrites of all time.

Slavery abolitionist and Founding Father Thomas Paine would agree with you. He literally called Washington a hypocrite (and incompetent) in an open letter.

One of the few "Founding Fathers" that I tend to like.

[-] asg101 5 points 4 days ago

Land of the Free that excluded blacks and women

As well as the indigenous and non-landowners.

U.S. oligarchs HATE competition. They conned the rubes of 1776 to fight the British monarchy so they could have a monopoly on graft in the colonies, the U.S. finally got pulled kicking and screaming into WW1 and WW2 because they hated the competition from Germany et al, and not out of any love for Europe. The support for Hitler among the U.S. ruling class was high and well documented, including Prescott Bush.

[-] silverlose@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

Okay sure. Just ignore the main point I was making. Sounds like a thing a coward would do. Have fun living under tyranny.

[-] djsoren19 5 points 4 days ago

Your point is based on fundamentally flawed information. You can make the argument that Americans should engage in revolution! But I would point the example towards the great work of unions during the Industrial Revolution, rather than pointing to one of the many times the U.S. rose up to blindly support their oligarchs.

[-] silverlose@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago

How is my information fundamentally flawed, exactly? Did the USA have a revolution? Did the very same people who took part in that revolution also turn around and clearly state that it is a right to rebel?

I agreed with your idea that they were oligarchs. How is that relevant? The revolution had help, how is that relevant? Are all oligarchs the same? Is that really a fair claim to make? What about the French? I don’t even feel like you have an argument, you’re just trying to justify your inaction.

I’m in favour of you using whatever example you need to make it make sense to you. Unions or whatever.

[-] djsoren19 2 points 4 days ago

Did the very same people who took part in that revolution also turn around and clearly state that it is a right to rebel?

Some did say that. You can likely count the number on your hands. But one of the very first actions the newly formed U.S. government took was putting down a rebellion. They were not supporters of revolution, they were supporters of their own personal interest.

I agreed with your idea that they were oligarchs. How is that relevant?

Because there are just as many people today who would be willing to rise up blindly in defense of their oligarchs, just as they were willing to fight for their oligarchs profit margins back then.

The revolution had help, how is that relevant?

Because leftist groups in the U.S. have none. We've been desperate for funding for decades now. All media outlets are suppressing us. You cannot expect the same level of performance as when the oligarchs were on our side.

Are all oligarchs really the same

The ones who deliberately use propoganda to incite poor people to fight for their profits are. Hell the French aristocracy weren't even helping the Americans for good reasons, they were just happy to use them as a warfront to weaken their real enemy in the British.

It seems like you fundamentally misunderstand the history and current situation in the United States, and are trying to criticize us without any context.

[-] silverlose@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

A state would never support a rebellion though…. Just because they understand revolution doesn’t mean they allow it under law. That’s not how it works. If you rebel you’re an enemy of the state until you over throw it.

Everyone is looking out for their own interests.

A lot of what you say is debatable and feels like mental gymnastics to avoid what you need to do. Ultimately it doesn’t matter. I don’t need to convince you, pain and suffering will.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

I'm not saying they didn't have help. I'm saying you have to start it yourselves! No one is going to swoop in and save you. YOU have to do it! Only then will you start getting others to join.

If you tell yourself you're powerless, then you are. You sit there doing nothing while making excuses for it.

YOU ARE NOT POWERLESS. Together you are strong. Get up and act like it.

[-] djsoren19 4 points 4 days ago

I know it sounds fun to believe that friendship or togetherness can topple a nation that's willing to drone strike its own citizens, but the truth is that the game is so heavily rigged in the U.S. that we have a lot of needs. We need guns, we need intelligence, and we need enough peer to peer outreach to actually organize. Without third-party assistance, it's pretty hard to go beyond the local protesting we've already been doing.

Everyone likes to fantasize about Jan 6th without realizing there were big financial groups working on outreach, organization, and supporting travel to the capital to make that happen. There is no money for the left in the U.S. You really want to yell at us, at least donate to organizations like Indivisible first.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Hey man, whatever you need to tell yourself to feel good about doing nothing.

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If it comes down to that then I’m sure me and some of my fellow Americans will rebel and put the 2nd amendment to the test.

[-] Photuris@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

American here. Our boys are nearly draft age. This shit is terrifying.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
1178 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22232 readers
3459 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS