73
submitted 2 weeks ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/europe@feddit.org

Archive: https://archive.is/2025.03.21-101658/https://www.ft.com/content/bf9dde37-2dc8-44df-b5f5-ef5dece888f6

On Friday, the constitutional reform secured the support of more than two-thirds of the seats in the Bundesrat, the upper house that represents Germany’s 16 federal states. 

The changes, which were approved by the Bundestag earlier this week, loosen the country’s constitutional borrowing restrictions to allow unlimited defence spending and create a special €500bn, 12-year vehicle to modernise the country’s infrastructure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee 20 points 2 weeks ago

Putin gonna be pootin his pants. Nuclear threat on Berlin when?

[-] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 15 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, that's where the nukes in Königsberg are aimed at, no?

[-] DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

I love that you call it Königsberg haha. But yes, you’re right! I forgot about that.

[-] federalreverse@feddit.org 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Merz' party is sending mixed signals right now between being pro-EU and signing off on an enlarged military budget but also two of the negotiants for the coalition treaty suggesting a reopening of Nord Stream, others more or less openly endorsing Trump as well as Merz himself repurposing autocratic tactics like questioning left-wing NGOs.

[-] DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

If they re-open nord stream, that would lead to MASSIVE backlash from the opposition and the population.

Not saying they won’t do it, just that if they do, they better be prepared.

[-] daw@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

I thin that's just what we call "spinner" and does not represent the party line. I think if you look at the strength of the signals, uncapping safety spending over an amount where reaching anyways is a very fucking strong signal. If they actually spend accordingly which I thin they will do because every single one of those fuckers will find a way to make their hometown benefit from it. Also it's easy to sell as nationalistic/patriotic preventing the usual storms of bullshit around government spending.

The autocratic twist I agree on but not to the degree that it immediately threatens our democracy, maybe by proxy though.

Although I have some criticism on the specifics of the deal it is a very strong sign of strong agency to be able to do this immediately after an election even before the new parliament is constituted. I believe that strong agency is the biggest threat to Russia actually.

[-] federalreverse@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I thin[k] that's just what we call "spinner" and does not represent the party line.

No, it's not just random "idiots." Someone just submitted this to !dach: https://www.t-online.de/id_100620746/ (German).

The article makes it clear that there are near-direct personal lines between pro-Nord Stream law firms and Merz. Merz himself is a former lobbyist for BASF, which used to be heavily involved in importing Russian gas through its Wintershall subsidiary.

In addition, overall corruption will be front and center in the new German government. Merz is a former lobbyist; the projected new minister of agriculture, Felßner, is an agricultural lobbyist; the projected new president of Bundestag, Klöckner, is known for being overly friendly with Nestlé; Spahn is known for having sunk billions into FFP mask deals that included networks close to CxU; Dobrindt started the toll project that was non-compliant with EU regulation and sunk hundreds of millions [...] A bunch of power-hungry asshats that played obstructionist opposition for 3 years, so they could come into power and direct positive cashflows into their own pockets and ruin trust in democratic systems at the same time. SPD will have a hard time reigning in "deregulation" of anti-corruption measures as well.

uncapping safety spending over an amount where reaching anyways is a very fucking strong signal

That money and the weapons it buys can be used against anyone, not just Putin. It might just be another vehicle for corruption.

not to the degree that it immediately threatens our democracy

They're always moving the line a little bit, finding out what they can do.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
73 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

5183 readers
1063 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS