51

Everybody loves Wikipedia, the surprisingly serious encyclopedia and the last gasp of Old Internet idealism!

(90 seconds later)

We regret to inform you that people write credulous shit about "AI" on Wikipedia as if that is morally OK.

Both of these are somewhat less bad than they were when I first noticed them, but they're still pretty bad. I am puzzled at how the latter even exists. I had thought that there were rules against just making a whole page about a neologism, but either I'm wrong about that or the "rules" aren't enforced very strongly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UberKitten 2 points 1 month ago

OP says about “write credulous shit about ‘AI’” implying that both articles are non-credulous. The former article is thoroughly cited.

OP clearly doesn’t want either article to exist. I’m simply asking what’s the source that goes against the existing article and its citations.

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
51 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1791 readers
79 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS