51
Credulous coverage of AI slop on Wikipedia
(awful.systems)
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
OP says about “write credulous shit about ‘AI’” implying that both articles are non-credulous. The former article is thoroughly cited.
OP clearly doesn’t want either article to exist. I’m simply asking what’s the source that goes against the existing article and its citations.