521
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Elon Musk’s DOGE faces mounting pressure to show achievements amid criticism. Staffers, under pressure from Trump administration officials, seek public relations wins to counter negative headlines.

Cuts to federal offices led to mass layoffs, and efforts to modernize government services have been chaotic. DOGE prioritizes speed over security and protecting sensitive information.

Trump has distanced himself, stating agency chiefs, not Musk, control department cuts, preferring a "scalpel" over a "hatchet" approach. Public opinion has turned against DOGE, with 48% disapproving versus 34% approving, according to a Washington Post-Ipsos poll.

With limited time before their tenure ends, DOGE officials are desperate to show results.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

I wouldn’t call it “efficient” but I would call it optimal given the complexity.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

"Optimal given the complexity" fits the definition of efficient.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I think it certainly can, since humans are involved, and humans are messy.

A lot of government stuff should be automated in software, but that takes an immense amount of time to develop. Like… why are taxes so hard when the IRS always has all my data?

Efficient? Not as much as it should be. But good luck wrangling that many people’s needs at once.

[-] frosty99c@midwest.social 17 points 1 day ago

I mean, simple file should already be a thing, and the IRS would prefer it be easier for everyone to file. But h&r block and turbotax have lobbied heavily against it because they'd lose money with easier filing. One way to make things more streamlined and efficient would be to get rid of middle men and focus on making internal systems better.

But this administration wants the internal systems to be broken and needlessly complex so that they can outsource it to their preferred middle men so that they all make a lot more money.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

And they were spamming everyday to one of my emails, when Trump won. When before they dint since I haven't used their (free now defunct filing) since 2023

[-] RoamingWanderer@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah a lot of government inefficiencies can be explained by the private sector blocking their abilities and influencing sellout politicians. If lawmakers truly worked for the interests of the masses you'd see a lot better systems/procedures. You think long voting lines are because the government can't run elections properly? Nah it's from lawmakers purposefully making things worse to better themselves

[-] fake_meows@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

Like… why are taxes so hard when the IRS always has all my data?

In some European countries, the government automatically does the taxes and just sends a letter showing the result of the calculation so you have a chance to review the result.

They have all the numbers already...

[-] TylerBourbon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Taxes are so hard because Tax Return Companies spend a lot of money to lobby the government to make it harder. The IRS could do it all in-house for "free" but there's too much money in making us go through 3rd parties to file our taxes. Private business always finds a way to add more inefficiency to processes to make us pay more so they can nickel and dime us. "Want that efficient service? Well, you got to pay more." It's a scam.

There is a lot of stuff, sure, that could be automated in software, but that's mostly admin work, like processing invoices and things like that. But then, no one ever wants to spend money on things. For instance, I work for a state DOT. It's a battle to get the state legislature to properly fund maintenance. They'd rather spend their money on new shiny things they can show off to get elected.

The real inefficiency in government is almost always directly related to the elected official's decisions. Take graffiti, they don't want to spend money, and we don't have the budget to keep up with graffiti and provide road maintenance. But then a big sports event or famous band comes to town for a huge event, and next thing you know graffiti is our number one priority.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

Another thing, is if tax filing is too easy the IRS would have more time and money to go after rich people and corporations, they can't have that.

Shit's so silly. Especially with taxes. It's an example of exactly what's wrong with this country.

As far as graffiti goes, I think we should just let people go at it. The city belongs to the people, let them paint it. If someone scrawls "I floss my teeth with ass hair" across a wall, a better artist will come put something cool over it.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

A lot of government 'redundancy' is the auditing/oversight process where people check other people's work. Plus ensuring there is adequate staffing for the busy times, like tax season!

But a lot of the things like not having taxes automatically calculated for the vast majority of the population or similar complex systems is the fault of the legislature. They wrote the laws that kept the IRS from building the system that lets people confirm their taxes are right and add exemptions.

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
521 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21568 readers
3935 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS