cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/26223998
Housing Rule
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
Yes. Yes. We played video games or read books or had to have our parents drive us to a park or walked the whole way (no sidewalks) there.
Because our officials are incompetent. Yes. Yes.
See above on lobbying from oil and car companies.
Because the word "commie" is scary to Americans from decades of indoctrination and the "nuclear family" having their own home is the biggest lie in the "American Dream."
Because of zoning laws. Refer to the above about incompetent officials. Yep, it is simply not possible and legal.
Americans care way more about appearances than actually having things be useful. What can I say, we're fucking coddled.
Hope this helps. It's valid to still be baffled at such.
No, malicious. Racist in fact.
Suburbs were intentionally designed to be hostile to families without a car. This created a financial barrier to living in the suburbs, organically weeding out "undesirable" (aka non-white) families. Yes this also meant that many white families also couldn't afford to move to the suburbs, but that was a downside the rich white racists were willing to accept if it meant keeping most non-white families out.
You're absolutely right but I'm also gonna go out on a limb and say malicious/racist and incompetent are not mutually exclusive from one another.
Definitely!!!
I think this was a feature, not a downside. (I agree with the rest of your post tho)
Add in redlining and you've got yourself a good ol' American suburb!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redlining
But that is the strange part to me: its appearance is awful. A big garden full of plants is much nicer looking than only grass.
So many Americans get rock hard about their lawns, and demand that everyone else does as well. There is no logic to it
Two pet theories I have about this
it is profitable for big chemical companies and whatever lobby makes the lawnmowers and weed whackers for everyone to have these big lawns that need to be maintained via mowing and pesticides. There are breeds other than bluegrass that don't grow that tall, chiefly buffalo grass, with deeper roots that make it generally more healthy, less patchy, less susceptible to weeds, etc.
It is convenient for the ruling class that we have to do all this maintenance individually, leaving us less time (and wealth) to organize and build community/alternative modes of governance. Divide and conquer and all that.
OK I lied here's a 3rd:
But HOAs mandate then
I saw a case of a guy who was being prosecuted for having unruly lawn. The kicker? He was elderly with cancer, and his son used to do it, but he went away for a while and no one was doing it. The judge said, and I quote: "You should be ashamed of yourself. If i could give you jail time, I would. Why should the neighbours have to look at that?". HE WAS ELDERLY AND CANCER RIDDLED.
Ah okay, that explains it.