593
        you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
    
  
  
    view the rest of the comments
        this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
        
  
      
  
      593 points (100.0% liked)
      Technology
    76567 readers
  
      
      2278 users here now
  
      This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
 - Only tech related news or articles.
 - Be excellent to each other!
 - Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
 - Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
 - Politics threads may be removed.
 - No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
 - Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
 - Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
 - Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
 
Approved Bots
        founded 2 years ago
      
  
  
      MODERATORS
      
  
    
Someone else posted a writeup about it.
It wasn't in documentation, but a code comment. No user would see this.
One part was a rejected change on the README, which was trying to remove this "white supremacist language":
Someone changing "he" to "they" (original PR that started all this) in a comment as their only change could absolutely be seen as "politically motivated." My understanding is that if changing the comment was part of some larger useful change, it would be fine (as would using "she" or "they" in a new comment), but just changing the gender of a pronoun in a comment is a useless change.
If the comment said "she," would someone have been motivated to make this change? Probably not. Should changing this from "she" to some other pronoun (he or they) also be rejected? Yes, on the same grounds as changing it from "he," it's not a useful change and just wastes everyone's time. If you're in the code already, then go ahead, correct silly language like this if you care to.
I never said they were.
Look at the fallout in the comments on those PRs, it quickly devolved into politics and quickly away from any technical merit.
If this exact same change were included with other changes, I highly doubt anyone would've cared about the comment. The issue isn't with the text of the comment, but with the likely motivation and the actual merits of the PR. Many projects immediately reject tiny PRs because they clog up the review queue, and that appears to be what's happening here, plus all the political nonsense in the issue comments.
They are political, because people (I'm not one of them) think they shouldn't be allowed and there are only two genders (e.g. the current president of the US).