295
submitted 20 hours ago by marathon01@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Thanks, appreciate the support!

It's amazing how bent out of shape some people get about this, both currently, as well as about tenish months ago when I last was on Lemmy (check out my comment history from that time period if you really want to get annoyed).

I got to imagine that its people who want to farm the comments for their LLMs training, that are trying to prevent the popular usage of people licensing their content.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

And I'm assuming just having "all content licesed under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0" in your bio wouldn't work?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

And I’m assuming just having “all content licesed under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0” in your bio wouldn’t work?

I'm not sure if I understand your question.

I believe it does work. Or at least it should, and I shouldn't give up my right to license my own content just because enforcement of laws is lax.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

Well, scrapers probably would ignore it.

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

Honestly I don't believe it would help myself but who am I to tell you what to do. As someone else mentioned, it's probably people who simply have to correct others when they don't share the option. Doubt it would be anything like being in support of LLMs, probably the opposite.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Honestly I don’t believe it would help myself

It would help if the companies that are training their LLMs honor content creators licenses. If they ignore the law in that, then it would in theory need to be policed.

In either case, its a quick copy/paste on my part, so /shrug.

As someone else mentioned, it’s probably people who simply have to correct others when they don’t share the option. Doubt it would be anything like being in support of LLMs, probably the opposite.

I don't know. It would behoove those who need our content to train their LLMs to intimidate/redirect people away from licensing their content. And I can't imagine regular people getting so caught up to spend so much time on this issue. If you look through my comment history, starting 9-10 months ago, and see how many replies I've gotten, and even how posts talk about this issue (https://lemmy.world/post/14942506), I can't imagine a single link would cause all of that. Theres got to be something more to it than that.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[-] a14o@feddit.org 4 points 4 hours ago

In either case, its a quick copy/paste on my part, so /shrug.

I was thinking "okay this somewhat unconventional but whatever" until I read this. Use greasemonkey or something for the love of Christ!

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
295 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

50488 readers
1016 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS