149
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

The governor removing a mayor from office who has not been convicted of a crime is a bad precedent.

[-] Wade@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago

Yes, because if there's anything the last 10 years of politics has taught us is that the Democrats need to care more about precedent than holding elected officials accountable

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Is extra judicial punishment ever acceptable? It’s sad how many people on this site seem to think so.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago

It is not only acceptable but is required when the judicial system is compromised how it is.

So you don’t believe rule of law is important? If you believe what you claim you cannot support any form of a just government.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 21 hours ago

So you don’t believe rule of law is important?

The Supreme Court is compromised. The Federal courts are partially in the hands of MAGA placeholders. Trump is attempting to nullify the constitution by executive order. There is no rule of law.

It's justice outside the formal system or no justice at all. Standing by idly and allowing elite impunity is not an acceptable approach.

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago

The thing is if you want to maintain rule of law then you need to follow those rules. You can’t just decide to ignore it when you want to but then pretend you have any legitimacy. That would make you no different than any other dictator.

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago

"They go low, we go high" has been so extremely useful in the last 10 years or so.

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

They go criminal we also act criminally isn't a good path to go down.

Why are so many people in this thread advocating extra judicial action when many/most of us are complaining about the GOP doing the same?

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

The rule of law is important, that's the entire point. It's being flouted openly in all corners or our government. I can support a just government, but we do not have one, and we do not stand a chance of instating one without removing the openly corrupt one that we have in place. Simple as that.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Wade@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Yes? Don't you think Trump should have been removed from office in his first term?

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you were being investigated by the FBI for corruption and openly pulled a quid pro quo with a political figure, would you still have a job?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

Being removed from office is not "punishment."

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MadBigote@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

That mayor is causing a crisis because he doesn't want to be convicted of a crime he has already been accused of

Trump is protecting Adams because he knows that Adams will deport people given the chance.

Regardless unless he has been convicted we can’t have governors removing mayors. This will permit others to just remove mayors they dislike.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 21 hours ago

unless he has been convicted we can’t have governors removing mayors

NY state law disagrees with you on that.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

And what happens if those other governors remove mayors for political reasons anyway?

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

They will be able to cite the extrajudicial removal of Adams as precedent for why they can do it.

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
149 points (100.0% liked)

News

25269 readers
3604 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS