907
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

Bluesky will follow the same enshittification trajectory Twitter did, it is just the beginning of the rollercoaster where the coaster is slowly brought up to the top to be launched... and everyone is exclaiming "wow I haven't even thrown up yet!" as if that was any indicator of how much they were about to throw up...

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 9 hours ago

Yes but Twitter was fine for well over 10 years so it's fine. Like I don't understand this attitude that we can't enjoy something now because at some point in the future it may theoretically be not as good.

[-] arc@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe it will, but for the time being it hasn't. The experience is so vastly better than Twitter, that it's a no brainer to jump over. It also helps to have a decent competing platform that people like to suck users and influence away from the platform that Musk turned into a cesspit.

[-] MarkalAlvarez@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I don’t think it will go down the same path as Twitter, since Bluesky is open source and available on Github other devs will have the possibility to improve it or create a better version of it but with the more users joining it might necessary to monetize it to better cover the costs. I would love to see everyone switching to the Fediverse but it’s not very intuitive for the average end user with the instances and the fact that you need to target a user and an instance to follow it

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago

*an incomplete subset of Bluesky is opensource

[-] MarkalAlvarez@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

what do you mean by incomplete subset ? The code is available on Github and can be compiled

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago

The entire appview layer is proprietary in practice and in spirit.

[-] MarkalAlvarez@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

can you please be more specific ? What proprietary parts you found ? Did you read the code ? Again code is open source and anyone can read it and modify it, there is no proprietary, the license used is MIT not another weird license that limit the code from being used for other purposes like commercial stuff

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 28 minutes ago

The code isn't available for the parts that aren't open source? Just because a component of a system is open source doesn't mean the entire system can be called open source.

That is a dangerous conflation to make in public discourse about this as it warps the conversation in artificial ways.

Make NO mistake if the entire system was actually open source they would have no way to lucratively monetize bluesky, and that is precisely what they will do.

The CEO of Bluesky has gone on record saying they haven't ruled out monetizing through forcing ads on a system. Do you not understand that is functionally impossible to force ads on a fully open source system?

how can you be so stunningly naive

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
907 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

61774 readers
3606 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS