545
Anon gives up on Bitcoin in 2010
(sh.itjust.works)
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
They're trying to dump their bags on the US government. Is it illegal? Sadly no. Should it be? Yes.
Your opinion won't matter. You don't own an exchange, you aren't a major bitcoin miner, and you're not a platform landlord or newspaper editor.
The people I mentioned above don't want Bitcoin, they want actual money. If devaluing Bitcoin will let them get more money, they'll do it in a heartbeat.
To make an analogy for the lightning network, imagine each time you made a credit card payment, you have a to roll a die, and only if it comes up as a six, your payment goes through.
If they are dumping their bags now, which SHOULD make them criminals, what were they when they bought those bags? You make zero sense.
Again you show zero understanding or knowledge of bitcoin. Node runners showed miners who is in control in 2017, and they will happily do so again.
That's cute, previously you pretended that only onchain exists, and now you're a lightning expert, an expert who is unable to run a well connected node. Okay.
They're using their influence on the government to enrich themselves. Textbook corruption. Shouldn't be surprised that you don't understand that.
Node runners gained a victory so grand in 2017, that it can't be spoken aloud, for the heavens would cave in under such splendor.
Are those 'well connected nodes' in the room with us right now?