1686
Happy #GlobalSwitchDay (discuss.tchncs.de)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 38 points 23 hours ago

Signal is centralized, loops is closed source and not accepting new users.

[-] Esmoreit@lemmings.world 17 points 23 hours ago

Loops will be open sourced later they say.

Is Loops open source? It will be! We plan on open sourcing the platform after it reaches a stable and easy to maintain state.

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 21 points 22 hours ago

That really is not a satisfying answer. It is incredibly nebulous and even if it did have a nice definition I guarantee most software developers will tell you a lot of software rarely reaches that state.

I can see why they might want to avoid 1000 GitHub issues bike shedding things but they could open source the code and just not have open contribution

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 4 hours ago

Sometimes you’re ashamed of the ugly hacks you cobbled together to reach MVP, and you want to fix the stuff you know you need to fix first before being thrown to the wolves. I can respect that, for a limited time.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

or they can also disable submitting issues for now

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 11 points 21 hours ago

That means very little to me. Actions speak louder than words, and it would probably help the development of loops if it was actually open source.

[-] MrRazamataz@lemmy.razbot.xyz 5 points 16 hours ago

Made by the same dev as Pixelfed, which did a similar thing.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

Which I think dansup should deserve our trust on this for quite a long time for doing. It isn't empty promises if they already made Pixelfed and opensourced it.

Like.. I suppose it could be a grift, anything could but I see no reason to question their goals or motives.

[-] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Loops is anti-libre software confirmed.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

anti? is it against libre software? because it doesn't seem so

[-] stevo887@lemmings.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Why does software have a political stance?

[-] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It's missing a libre software licence text file.

load more comments (16 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
1686 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

29517 readers
965 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS