585

Summary

Vice President JD Vance claimed that Donald Trump’s policies will lower grocery prices, but he failed to provide details.

Instead, Vance emphasized vague goals like increasing capital investment and job creation.

Meanwhile, Trump’s recent tariff threats, including a 25% increase on Colombian coffee imports, have driven coffee prices higher, exacerbating grocery costs.

Critics note Trump's shifting narrative, as he now admits it is "hard to bring things down once they’re up."

Supporters, however, downplayed price hikes, suggesting cheaper alternatives like instant coffee.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There are only 3 ways to lower(that came to my mind) prices in a quick way.

1: Abandon regulations. If corporations don't have to invest into safety, ecology and such stuff they have lower production costs which can mean lower prices.

2: More competition. If corporations have to compete with each other they usually start a battle over who gets the best quality for the lowest price.

3: Subsidies. Nothing to say here I guess.

Edit: Point one and three lower production costs. As others have already pointed out, these dont mean lower prices, but more profit for companys

[-] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Corporate has dispatched a kill team to your location.

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

1: Abandon regulations. If corporations don't have to invest into safety, ecology and such stuff they have lower production costs which can mean lower prices.

I think corporations have pretty clearly demonstrated an unwillingness to pass savings in their production chain on to the consumer. For example, very few items have gone back down to their pre-pandemic price point, even though scarcity and supply chain issues from COVID have largely resolved.

[-] adenoid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Corporations don't willingly give up money. In circumstances like 1 and 3 they'll more likely just say "thanks for making line go up more" lol. COVID imposed some supply issues that I would assume are mostly mitigated by now, but I haven't seen costs decrease, only increase--so now we have record profits in many contexts. Subsidies can sometimes help, but it seems to me that the most effective subsidies (in terms of lowering cost) are those with significant, more powerful corporate players downstream (e.g., corn in the US) rather than those purchased by individual consumers who have comparatively little power.

I don't know that 2 is necessarily quick, but competition can indeed lower prices if a competitor can actually survive against the behemoths in their respective markets. In those instances, corporations can try to shape regulation to squash the upstarts while leaving the big players alone.

I'm not sure that government really has the ability to lower prices in a way that isn't somehow perverted by large corporate entities given the power they have.

[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Youre right. I forgot that companies will likely not lower the prices.

[-] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Nationalize the companies involved in production and distribution and eliminate profit, making and selling everything at-cost also works.

[-] pfm@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There's too much evidence all over the world that point 1 would never work. If deregulation relieve then from certain costs, they'll happily enjoy higher profits. 🤷

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
  1. Reduce trade barriers, like tariffs
[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Secret option 4: general strike. Pay us more, charge less, or we'll eat the wealthy before we go hungry.

May 1st. 2028. We all walk out together.

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
585 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19607 readers
2453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS