submitted 4 days ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The big claim is that R1 was trained on far less computing power than OpenAI’s models at a fraction of the cost.

And people believe this ... why? I mean, shouldn't the default assumption about anything anyone in AI says is that it's a lie?

[-] ShakingMyHead@awful.systems 4 points 3 days ago

Should be, but it isn't.

load more comments (5 replies)

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025

33 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1580 readers

242 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS