631

Donald Trump has suggested large numbers of Palestinians should leave Gaza to “just clean out” the whole strip, after ordering the US military to restart shipments of 2,000lb bombs to Israel.

The US president said he wanted Gaza residents to move to neighbouring nations, and that they could be displaced “temporarily or could be long-term”, after a phone call with Jordan’s King Abdullah on Saturday.

“I said to him: I’d love you to take on more because I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now and it’s a mess, it’s a real mess. I’d like him to take people,” Trump said, when asked about the call.

He also suggested Egypt as a destination for Gaza residents, and said he would raise the issue with President Abdel Fatah al-Sisi on Sunday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 95 points 5 days ago

I guess it's time for all the "protest voters" to either admit they never gave a shit about Palestine or admit they fell for Russian propaganda.

Of course that's if they remember about Palestine. A shiny red ball might have rolled past and distracted them.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

@generalemergency,
Dnc centrists who wouldnt let any possible supporters of Palestinians into the democratic party convention are the real unsung heros here, right?

Do your posts like this one make you feel better about yourself? Thats why you're posting isnt it. You told yourself you 'held your nose' while voting but you didnt really hold your nose at all. You were happy to drop every semblence of basic human morality and dignity in order to win-- and then you lost anyway.. Now you're angry at those on your own side who didnt shit their own bed and roll around in it like you did.

To win at all in the future and reclaim the demographic losses, the dems need to admit that what was done in Plaestine was wrong. They need to admit Biden and Harris both were not doing their job and not representing the working class, but were simply chasing corporate and special interest campaign dollars. If the party can do that it might survive. Otherwise its probably dead, becuase No one thinks the democrats stand for anything, and the rage evident at the elites related to Luigi's prosecution is increasingly the response toward out of touch dem leaders. No one supports corporatists so get your shit together.

[-] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 26 points 4 days ago

It's funny you think there will be legitimate elections in 4 years. I mean Republicans are already pushing ways to give Trump a third term. So like, congrats on having Gaza screwed even harder while simultaneously throwing away any semblance of democracy?

At least the corporate corrupt Dems gave a small window for changing things democratically while not screwing over Trans people in the USA as well.

By abstaining you allowed the greater evil to prevail, not prevented any evil from occuring.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

By abstaining you allowed the greater evil to prevail

I'm heartened to hear that you at least understand that Biden/Harris was evil. Its a good start.

[-] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

Actual leftists KNEW that already. Kamala, Biden, the majority of the DNC - they're all corrupt corporatists.

But the situation the USA was in was one of minimizing overall damage. And with the corporatists, there was still a small chance of gaining some control from them peacefully via elections, if simply because more left leaning people can at least run under the Democrat moniker.

With the fascists, that opportunity is gone. By allowing them to win, not only do you worsen the genocide occuring in Israel (if not ensured Israel from achieving it entirely), but also just got killed a bunch of other people and hurt a huge amount of minorities in the USA as well.

Not voting didn't stop the genocide and never would have, but it did guarantee that it gets worse while hurting other innocents outside of Palestine as well. If you didn't vote for Kamala (which literally means "horrible" in Finnish), you're a dumbass, because you allowed a greater evil to prevail. Especially since I know many of y'all abstainers are still paying taxes anyway and funding the genocides either way.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But the situation the USA was in was one of minimizing overall damage

thats logical in a narrow scoping, but I think its reasonable to also consider the longer term effects of the 'left' party in the US continuing a track of far right wing actions over time and how that changes the Democratic party and likely destroys it. No one will vote for republican-lite or fascist lite-- those platforms always lose. The DNC doesn't understand that. Maybe occasionally a Dem leader goes off the rails and can be disavowed later, sure, but if the party stays evil for long enough, that option of disavowing the evildoers' mistakes goes away and sticks to all dems. The voter losses across all demographics in the last elections show we are at the point of losing the voters and with that our ability to win in the future. For now its still an option to disavow and explicitly reject Biden/Harris's actions, if we find the stones to throw the old pro-evil anti-lower and anti-middle class leadership out on their ass and admit they were wrong.

Sure the war crimes were destined to happen with either party after the election-- and I'd argue with similar severity. Both parties will let the zionists do whatever they want, whenever they want, to whomever they want. Both parties will also fund the zionists with weapons and money, and will run interference in the UN. But I'd rather they be done by the US republicans which gives us at least a chance to rescue the US Dems, which was badly in need of rescue. Rescue means disempowering the bad actors, which is now completed. Without a dethroning of centrism that evil direction was immutable due to the way funding steers political action in the US. So the dems had to lose the election to pure evil or face political dissolution as evil lite in the short-middle time frame. Yes, the cost is dire in terms of Trump being much worse with internal policy. The prognosis for the US is possibly fatal.. We are on life support as a country of laws and as an entity on the world stage with global reserve currency dominance.

Before the election, both parties seemed inevitably doomed-- it was simply of whether it was in the very short term or in the short-medium term. Now the Dems might conceivably disavow their mistakes and correct themselves, after a trip to the woodshed for what we all should agree is a beating of the neolibs that needs to occur if we are to move forward.

Either way we have a lot to answer for as a people who perpetuate this political reality, which affects the world quite a bit. The concept of collective responsibility exists, even if Americans seldom talk about it or understand it.

[-] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 1 points 21 hours ago

Your argument doesn't follow logic.

  1. you say voting for Dems would destroy it, but letting literal fascists get absolute power would also destroy it, permanently, while also destroying why change for actual leftists to gain power.

  2. for some reason you think it's better to let the fascists win to destroy the center right, but not destroy the fascists by not allowing them to gain power continuously???

  3. you stated it's not ethical to allow the Democrats to continue existing as they are because they're not as a whole left wing and are also causing harm, but it's ethical to have many more suffer? That's just hypocrisy.

  4. you assume the DNC is dumb rather than corrupt

  5. you assume you'll still have a legitimate democracy after Trump.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

you say voting for Dems would destroy it, but letting literal fascists get absolute power would also destroy it, permanently,

"it" the first time being the democratic party. We cant prop up a far right dem party. correct.

Your second use of "it" is the republic itself.

Call me names all you want, or disagree all you want, thats fine with me.

[-] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

But you're literally propping up a much farther right republican party, and the dissolution of any democracy.

That is, by definition, hypocrisy. That's not me calling you a name, that's pointing out a fact in your actions.

Your actions and stated desired ultimate outcome simply don't match.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

Well, at least you can whine about how other people voted, and that'll make you feel better, I guess.

[-] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 11 points 4 days ago

Nah, but I can live with knowing I at least tried to stop literal Nazis from gaining absolute power.

Can you say the same?

[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Do you think Musk wouldn't pay Democrat to get what he wanted? He literally manage to get his wealth while 2 Democrat presidents held office.

I believe he just change teams because it was expected after Biden left the race.

I do believe he knew before it is official that Biden would drop and Trump assassination attempt and moment was clear that he will get the same votes as before so he diced to get favor early.

Some timeline:

Trump assassination attempt was on July 13, 2024

Public Musk endorsement was on the same day.

Biden left the race on July 21, 2024

I do believe that while he might not be publicly a Nazi he will get what he need throughout Democrat president based on his history.

[-] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago

That you still say he's not publicly a Nazi says everything.

[-] PyroNeurosis 4 points 4 days ago

While worded clumsily, I believe they were trying to say "had a Democrat become president, he would continue 'hiding his power level'"

[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Thanks, that what I meant and reading it again the sentence structure is twisted !

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Dnc centrists who wouldnt let any possible supporters of Palestinians into the democratic party convention are the real unsung heros here, right?

The guy you're responding to never said that. You've discredited your entire comment in the first sentence and there's no reason to even bother reading the rest of whatever you wrote.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 8 points 4 days ago

My dood, it is a two party system. Both parties sucked shit when it came to this issue, and the DNC lost votes due to this fact (as one side seems to like some genocide anyway). This issue across both awful parties is implied in the first post and is countered in the "discredited" comment, you know with the whole "held your nose" line. Guess you did not read that far....

You don't have to agree with the statement, but if you read that "discredited" comment you would see both of you; Know the worse party of the two won, and more importantly one of you seems to have an idea on how not to have the same thing happen again.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

My dood, when he opens with a flat out lie about what the guy he's responding to said, I'm not going to bother reading the rest of it. I thought that I made that pretty clear. So trying to have a discussion about the rest of what he had to say isn't going to be very productive.

Yes, it's a two party system and both sucked on this issue. But one sucks a whole fucking lot more on it and also sucks on literally every other issue there is. And I'm not going to coddle a bunch of people who can't see that.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 12 points 4 days ago

My dood, I am telling you they did not open with a flat out lie about the comment they are replying to. They are making a point you don't like, sure! But no where was there a lie about what people said, just inferences made.

Like cool, you dislike what was said, but spending more time defending your stance of not reading then just reading and downvoting is wild and silly.

[-] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

You were so worried looking at bed A you didn't think you'd be forced into bed B

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Watching you comment, I despair that dems didnt learn a damned thing from this election loss.

[-] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

And what lesson would that be? Because I've seen that line of thinking parroted a suspicious amount lately and I've seen one person actually explain what they mean.

So enlighten me.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And what lesson would that be?

I'll humor you, although I'm surprised you've not heard this yet:

What Dem leadership should have learned:

  • Have to get back to operating from a platform, not vibes or cult of personality.
  • No more genocide. Get back to leading from principle rather than realpolitik. Explicitely ditch the far right zionists-- we can make money elsewhere, and we are not a far right party.
  • Be the party of the people. Lower and middle class votes are needed to win. Get back to expanding social programs.
  • Stop insulting people. We don't "go high when they go low", we kick their ass wherever they are, but we don't insult voters, and we also dont self-censor for comity's sake.
  • To move fwd and reunite the coalition that is the Dem party, we have to acknowledge that the party hasnt been doing what the people want, and was also engaging in a genocide. No more weasel words around that. Lets get it over with.
  • Act like the party is a coalition, not a centrally controlled imperium. Stop kicking the left in the face.
  • Dont look for votes form the right.
  • Dont lionize bipartisanship as a goal unto itself.
  • Create metrics for success and be accountable for them.
  • Publish a long term plan for the party, and candidates who wont adhere to it shouldnt be in the party.
  • Kick out the right wingers. When we get Bidens/Manchins/Liebermans not towing the line, remove them from their committees and dont fund their re-elections. No dems should be against the platform like Biden did for ~40 years being anti abortion. He should have been kicked to the curb decades ago.
  • No more "seniority" in congressional leadership appointments. Go by merit and votes of the constituents.
  • term limits for leadership appointments.
  • A code of ethics. For starters, dems shouldnt ever be trading stocks the legislate on. It soils the image of the whole party when individuals are corrupt, and that needs to stop. Pelosi needs to go for her decades of insider trading. That never should have been permitted.
  • Set a mandatory retirement age for Dems. 70 sounds reasonable. If you are a judge you leave after 70 as soon as a dem administration can appoint your successor. No more waiting for death/incapacity and hurting your party when you go out that way. Lets get these people thinking of the party over their own arrogance. It took everyone way too lont to admit Biden was not fit to run again. That was BS. Party members should have been able to question his competence earlier.
  • No more telling states they cant vote in the primary like the dnc did with new hampshire.
  • no more shenanigans during primaries like Hillary did with Bernie.. They should be fair votes. No more effing superdelegates.
  • no more locking constituents out of the convention. The DNC doesnt get to censure voters requests. Those corrupt sons of bitches need to admit they work for us.
[-] index@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

It's time for people to understand that the blue and red party in america are the same shit and voting someone else or not supporting the government is the only way to make a change.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Voting for one of the clowns that got <1,000,000 votes isn't going to accomplish anything.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

Then don't support the government and think about another solution.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

I wonder if 1M other people just like you are saying that.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Even an extra million split between the greens, libertarians, socialist workers, etc isn't significant compared to the 70+million that the Democrats and Republicans each get.

[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

What was Biden or Kamala gonna do that woulda been better than this?

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Presumably the same stuff they did for the last year?

[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Supplying the munitions for a genocidal carpet bombing campaign? That's better?

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
631 points (100.0% liked)

World News

40038 readers
2605 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS