891
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Three plaintiffs testified about the trauma they experienced carrying nonviable pregnancies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

You can "truly believe" that the sky is falling too. Doesnt stop you from being wrong because you lack the basic understanding of the concepts.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Doesnt stop you from being wrong because you lack the basic understanding of the concepts.

So you think your argument is 100% factually correct, despite it clearly being an opinion.

I can admit that pro-choices have a reasonable argument, even though I don't subscribe to that opinion. If you refuse to see any other argument on a divided issue, I suggest you learn about the other sides argument, and it either strengthens your position or gives you more nuance on the division. Wanna know why politics is so divided? It's because people 100% think they're right and they won't listen to the other argument to understand it. You share that quality with the MAGA folks, I hope you learn to not have that awful quality.

[-] Cabrio@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Wanna know why politics is so divided? It's because people 100% think they're right and they won't listen to the other argument to understand it.

If self-awareness was a disease you'd be the healthiest person alive.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

If self-awareness was a disease you’d be the healthiest person alive.

It's funny you say this when the comment you responded to, I literally said "I can admit that pro-choices have a reasonable argument, even though I don’t subscribe to that opinion."

Can you say the same about the other 'sides' argument?

[-] Cabrio@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Do you practice being this stupid or does it come naturally?

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This guy is a nutjob. I argued with him yesterday in a post about England forcing teachers to notify parents if a child mentions anything about their gender identity and they kept referring to teachers as "servants" who should do as they say because they had some tax money taken from their check, referred to kids attending school as "forced government institutionalization," believe children are their property, and said a bunch of other right wing anti-government rants/conspiracy theories.

I wouldn't bother replying to them any further because they will also do a complete 180 on their supposed beliefs if it suits their current comment.

They belong in whatever facility they use to deprogram ex cult members.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
891 points (100.0% liked)

News

37131 readers
1922 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS