891
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Three plaintiffs testified about the trauma they experienced carrying nonviable pregnancies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Spacebar@lemmy.world 247 points 1 year ago

Horrible laws written mostly by men against women. Men who will never and have never been affected by what they are prohibiting.

It's so gross and infuriating.

[-] LadyAutumn 76 points 1 year ago

Even if it did affect them through someone they knew, the people writing the laws can afford to circumvent them. Make no mistake, these people do get abortions banned or not.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is NOT a men vs. women issue. It's a conservatives vs. sane people issue. Joe Biden didn't take away abortion access and Amy Coney Barrett did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Have you SEEN an anti-abortion rally? LOTS of women.

[-] DeadDjembe@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Men are the ones making the laws. And they have no idea about the biology. Take the politician from Ohio for example, who suggested that an ectopic pregnancy should be reimplanted into the uterus.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 236 points 1 year ago

Heartbreaking

One of the plaintiffs in the suit, Samantha Casiano, vomited on the stand while discussing her baby's fatal birth defect, which she said also put her life at risk.

Casiano said she learned at 20 weeks' gestation that her baby had anencephaly, a serious condition that meant the infant was missing parts of her brain and skull. Casiano said her obstetrician told her the baby would not survive after birth and gave her information about funeral homes.

Casiano read aloud a doctor’s note that diagnosed her pregnancy as high risk, then began to sob and ultimately threw up, prompting the judge to call a recess.

[-] Oderus@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

3 people downvoted facts? Fuck them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 172 points 1 year ago

Ashley Brandt, a Dallas resident, said she was pregnant with twins but learned one had a fatal condition called acrania. The longer she carried it, the more it jeopardized the survival of her other twin.

oh my god....

[-] FattestMattest@lemmy.world 105 points 1 year ago

I don't think you can be any more "pro life" than putting 2 other healthy people at risk to save the life of a baby that's going to die.

[-] journey01@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

Don't forget many "pro lifers" are in the same demographic as pro death penalty.

[-] Naz@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago

We're actually running out of spots in hell for hardworking Christians at this point. We're having to quadruple and octople stack souls together and it's a bit alarming. I've been having to repeat a ton of times to the incredulous that feeling like you're doing the right thing and doing the right thing, [aren't the same thing].

They seem genuinely shocked and confused, which leaves me feeling leery if they're actually idiots or evil. Hanlon's Razor says to always assume ignorance before malice.

You guys gotta do something or all your old people are gonna end up cooking.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ConfirmingMoose@reddthat.com 19 points 1 year ago

especially if it is a fetus and not a baby

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 92 points 1 year ago

And the far right are going to claim she's faking it like the disgusting people they are.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 83 points 1 year ago

I am surprised these Texas savages did not lock her up.

[-] Matt_Shatt@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Texas will soon be banning women from vomiting in public. That’ll solve that issue.

[-] Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz 76 points 1 year ago

These types of laws are sick and barbaric and not indicitive of a civilised society! These woman should not have to revisit their trauma but they are fucking made to by a sick group of degenerates who make laws that the majority simply don't want!

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

The cruelty of it is the point.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] MostlyBirds@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Any doctor who complies with this ban is a worthless piece of shit. Not as bad as the subhumans who wrote it and voted for it, but pretty fucking close.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Physicians who violate Texas’s abortion laws can lose their medical licenses, face up to 99 years in prison or incur fines of at least $100,000, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights"

You wouldn't have to deal with any decision as hard as this. How can you say a doctor is complicit? They're likely just doing their best then a law gets put in place threatening life in prison.

Unless you're put in that position, you have no room to say that shit.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
891 points (100.0% liked)

News

23301 readers
3060 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS