657
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Umbra@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Both parties are gerrymandering as much as they can get away with. If you meant the electoral college that's part of being a federation of states, sorry. Changing the rules to benefit your team is not exactly fair either, right?

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

If the number of electors was distributed in a way that didn't give disproportional representation to states with very small populations, that would be great. Also, the notion that the US is truly a federation of independent states hasn't been accurate for at least 200 years.

[-] Umbra@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It's a bit disproportional for a few states but then again, you can say the votes of people in Wyoming are worth more relatively speaking but it's still just 3 electors in the end. No one will pay much attention to them either way, unlike the more populous states which can swing elections.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

unlike the more populous states which can swing elections.

You say that like it's a bad thing for people to be in charge rather than arbitrary lines drawn on maps.

[-] Umbra@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm saying they don't matter with their 3 votes, I don't think the people there feel very important in deciding the presidential election.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

It is not just Wyoming, but many states. States like Wyoming and North Dakota get 2-3 times the votes per population as states like California, Florida or Illinois. For states such as New Mexico and Arkansas, the ratio is more like 1.5 times the more populous states. It just doesn't make sense according to how the system is supposed to work.

[-] shortgiraffe@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some people's vote being worth more is not exactly fair. Having equal representation isn't changing the rules to be in favor of one side, unless you count democracy as a "side".

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, that's a straight up lie. Multiple blue states have independent commissions that draw the maps, meanwhile red states refuse to allow even that.

I'm sick of fascists trying to gaslight people into believing that everyone is the same as they are. You're a blatant liar.

[-] Umbra@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Typical repug, zero counter argument because you know you're a liar. Thanks for proving it.

[-] Aloomineum@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

We can all see you upvote your own posts

[-] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

FYI: When you post, there's a single upvote automatically comes up.

[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

One party wants to directly fuck with your life removing things people have found a need for, the other is slow. Pick your poison I guess.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

And then you woke up.

[-] Saneless@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Fuck the teams. What's my team? I'm an independent. I've never once been registered in a party in my decades of voting. Knock off the team bullshit. It's how idiots think

It would be nice if 40-45% of the country didn't try to force the other 60% to live by their rules.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol you're only an independent because it inflates your ego. You actually think you're smarter than everyone else. You even say as much. It has fuck all to do with your political views or any desire to make the country a better place.

[-] Saneless@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm an independent because I will vote for whoever makes sense. I never vote party line and I never vote for only one party consistently. If I'm calling people stupid it's because they think aligning with a party no matter what makes sense. It doesn't. It's rigid and ignorant. So yeah, I'm smarter than people like that

Just lately, republicans have become so toxic and stupid, I wouldn't dare vote that way. It's objectively terrible

[-] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

We need and deserve ranked-choice voting.

[-] Saneless@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And for that to happen we need the current gatekeepers to allow the change. There's no incentive for them to ever do what voters want or need

[-] Umbra@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Would be nice if the majority doesn't force the minority to live by their rules either.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So instead you allow a crazy ass minority most people don't agree with to do the same thing. How convenient for you.

Almond joys got deez nuts, Mounds don’t

[-] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Both candy bars are underrated though :3

[-] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Both candy bars are underrated though

I’ll die on this hill with you.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
657 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3722 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS