183
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] voidx@futurology.today 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There was too little rain this year which made the fires much worse.

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 4 points 11 months ago

Blaming it on climate change seems like a cop-out for the egregious failure and oversight by the local/state government.

[-] WadeTheWizard@fedia.io 23 points 11 months ago

Blaming it on local/state government seems like a cop-out for the egregious failure and oversight by world governments and the fossil fuel industry.

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 1 points 11 months ago

None of that contributed to these fires. They were started by people, regardless of climate change. It is disingenuous to appropriate climate change as the culprit to this and dismiss any responsibility from the leaders of California.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No it isn't. Climate change has changed the predicability and severity of weather. It's established fact. They had a ton of rain months ago, which cause a ton of plants to grow, then, a drought which dried that extra vegetation up. Along with that, they're receiving 100mph winds.

To say that is normal there is being disingenuous.

https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2025/01/the-role-of-climate-change-in-the-catastrophic-2025-los-angeles-fires/

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 1 points 11 months ago

You have no idea wtf you’re talking about. Look up pyroconvective effects of large fires. Climate change has nothing to do with the extreme winds.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I don't need to, I can rely on people that have dedicated their entire lives to studying it, and they agree with each other.

Also, read the article.

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 1 points 11 months ago
[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I'm over it, plausible deniability was done for this a decade ago. Take care

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It's ok to be wrong. Being wrong is actually really handy - you get to learn something. I understand it's hard to be vulnerable and admit you are wrong but it does show a lot of character.

I'd urge you to find a way to do that. You will be the better for it.

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 1 points 11 months ago

Dispute anything I’ve said. Tell me how it’s wrong.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

The problem with drought and high winds is that a spark grows into this. There was some 2023 Canada wildfire arson to prove "climate change a hoax", but it's the rapid spread that is global warming related, not that sparks are new.

[-] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

Sure snowflake, 90mph wind gusts after months of drought conditions is the government's fault. It's not like the entire western US and Canada have seen increasing red flag conditions for years which are only getting worse.

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 1 points 11 months ago

See my other comments. You evidently lack any knowledge about fires. Understand how firestorms work before commenting like an ignoramous. Otherwise, detail for me how climate change caused the “90mph winds”, which aren’t anything unique here.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

100mph winds and drought are not that easy to fight/control. Budget decisions look bad in retrospect, but the budget required to handle this would not have been approved/popular.

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
183 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

3538 readers
66 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS