183
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 1 points 1 year ago

None of that contributed to these fires. They were started by people, regardless of climate change. It is disingenuous to appropriate climate change as the culprit to this and dismiss any responsibility from the leaders of California.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No it isn't. Climate change has changed the predicability and severity of weather. It's established fact. They had a ton of rain months ago, which cause a ton of plants to grow, then, a drought which dried that extra vegetation up. Along with that, they're receiving 100mph winds.

To say that is normal there is being disingenuous.

https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2025/01/the-role-of-climate-change-in-the-catastrophic-2025-los-angeles-fires/

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 1 points 1 year ago

You have no idea wtf you’re talking about. Look up pyroconvective effects of large fires. Climate change has nothing to do with the extreme winds.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I don't need to, I can rely on people that have dedicated their entire lives to studying it, and they agree with each other.

Also, read the article.

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 1 points 1 year ago
[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm over it, plausible deniability was done for this a decade ago. Take care

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's ok to be wrong. Being wrong is actually really handy - you get to learn something. I understand it's hard to be vulnerable and admit you are wrong but it does show a lot of character.

I'd urge you to find a way to do that. You will be the better for it.

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 1 points 1 year ago

Dispute anything I’ve said. Tell me how it’s wrong.

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
183 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

4138 readers
19 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS