167
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 27 points 2 weeks ago

Functionally erasing the author’s copyright, is the issue.

[-] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 2 points 2 weeks ago

Are there court decisions on that I've missed or something? As soon as it reproduces enough to prove it's a derivative work, game over.

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 22 points 2 weeks ago

You can let gemini to reproduce the lyrics from "if you wanna be my lover" verbatim if you ask about it. There's not a court decision yet but anthropic is being sued for that reason (now a heavy bias forbids that)

[-] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 3 points 2 weeks ago

Then I have no idea why would anyone think it's erasing copyright. Or that it needs to be regulated. The laws are there, just apply them.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

You can get people to do that

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

Yes, and? AI is not a person, and is not even remotely comparable to a person.

I can spout off unrelated and not relevant things as well! Hippo sweat is red and looks somewhat like blood!

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
167 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1563 readers
227 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS