115
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah, but brutal doesn’t mean good. Brutal is usually bad, because it means you can’t get any real loyalty. Too soft isn’t good either, but I feel like Soviet counterintelligence was mostly just randomly killing people you decided they were “bad” and punishing people to get information, both of which are often counterproductive.

The Sovs were actually quite intricate in setting up blackmail, threats, hostage situations, leveraging useful idiots, making it an offense NOT to inform, etc etc etc. And the way they made Soviet society work, there wasn't the freedom of movement or association that espionage benefits from in non-totalitarian countries.

I was talking about the 2002 coup which I think is credibly believed to be US-backed. All Chavez’s crazy authoritarian stuff came after that, as far as I’m aware. I thought until years and years after that, he was just doing normal Latin American politics with communism, with a marked level of success and popularity.

Chavez basically immediately went all-in in 1999 on hollowing out Venezuela's institutions and replacing all positions of power with his cronies.

I think Stalin was by far the worst and most brutal of all the Bolsheviks. If it had been Trotsky and Lenin, I think things would have been way different. Seeing touches of Castro or Chavez in Trotsky, and touches of Saddam Hussein in Stalin, is part of what leads me to the type of thinking that makes me think maybe the US was pulling for Stalin.

I think you give too much credit to Trotsky and Lenin. They were both very big on the Bolshevik single-party state being run via terror.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 5 points 3 days ago

I read up a little bit more. I think you are right and I will have to abandon my pet theory. Oh well. It was a fun theory.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

It was far from an absurd thought! Allied intelligence during WW2, for example, considered that an assassination attempt against Hitler might be counterproductive because they considered Hitler more a handicap to the Nazis than a help.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah it’s interesting how many people seem to think that Lenin and Trotsky were the good guys and things would have been so different if Stalin hadn’t risen to power.

Almost all of the terrible things Stalin did were started by the earlier Bolshevik leaders. They were all blood-soaked tyrants. The difference is that Stalin perfected their methods.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
115 points (100.0% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1455 readers
86 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS