549
submitted 1 week ago by FundMECFSResearch to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sneq2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Why don’t you post more than that? Earth exists much longer than this. There are data about Earth temperature for hundreds of milions of years, but it probably doesn’t fit your theory, eg: https://www.climate.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_620_original_image/public/graph-from-scott-wing-620px.png?itok=Jgi659bn

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

Has there ever been a period in Earth's history where CO2 concentration in the atmosphere changed this quickly without being accompanied by mass extinctions?

[-] ZMoney@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum is actually a great analogue for what we're currently experiencing. Huge increase in global temperature over a relatively short period of time, probably due to runaway methane release. It went back to normal within a few hundred thousand years because of increased planktonic CO2 sequestration in the expanded tropical zone.

[-] Shortstack@reddthat.com 14 points 1 week ago

Humans came into existence during the ice caps phase.

The earth may have seen higher temperatures but we as a species or any of our humanoid ancestors have certainly not.

It’s disingenuous to frame the issue as just another hot period on earth

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

do you have the CO2 data for that period as well

[-] Agosagror@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Take the rate of change by time of that curve and plot it, you'll see a massive spike during today, And a line that bounces around zero for the rest of timeframe.

I think the point isn't so much that Earth will heat up but that it will do so at a tremendous pace (in geological timescales). Nature can't adapt so quickly. Basically it will lead to a mass extinction simply because of how quickly it is happening. Nature takes a longer time to genetically adapt to a changing environment than humans have even existed. That's the problem.

this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
549 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5461 readers
254 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS