336
submitted 3 months ago by Servais@discuss.tchncs.de to c/yurop@lemm.ee
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That does not mean it didn’t reduce them.

Yes that's explicitly what they meant. Most new passengers were people who were Walking or cycling before, but not a Lot of people who were driving before

Then you say the tram in Montpellier isn’t good, like what on earth does that have to do with anything?

That you should Invest the funds used for free Public Transport in improving the Network and it's quality.

Don't get me wrong, you should still offer cheap/free Tickets to People who need them, but nothing wrong to collect additional funds to finance the system

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Most

Most. Not all or nothing. So your initial statement is still wrong.

Also, why pay it with ticket sales which costs more than raw taxes?

this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
336 points (100.0% liked)

YUROP

2173 readers
47 users here now

A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.

Topics that should not be discussed here:

Other European communities

Other casual communities:

Language communities

Cities

Countries

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS