194
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Toto@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

Wish they gave the current energy density of lithium batteries for comparison.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Here's a neat comparison of how different chemistries preform. Higher up is higher energy per weight.

comparison

Looks like this is pretty old though

[-] eltrain123@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

It’s a range, but LFP is generally in the 90-160wh/kg and NMC (lithium manganese cobalt oxide) tops out around 275 wh/kg.

It’s not quite double, but doubles the density of most mass manufactured cells. Time will tell if it gets to scale, but it’s a step in the right direction.

[-] Toto@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Feeling stupid: doesn’t this mean more energy per kilogram is possible with Na cells?

[-] DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Lithium ion is around 265-280wh/kg but hydrogen is already in the kWh

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Isn’t most of the weight with hydrogen coming from the high pressure tank and gas regulator?

My impression is that the gas is light but whole system hydrogen is pretty heavy.

edit: Did some more reading. Hydrogen is still competitive on a Wh/kg basis, but worse on a Wh/L basis. Larger tanks are harder to fit in passenger cars than batteries and hydrogen’s poor whole system efficiency has kept fuel prices high while lithium batteries and solar power keep getting cheaper.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

H2 to get weight of tank down and highest density can be liquified. This works best by far for aviation that refuels right before takeoff. Can work for commercial boats as well. Costs more energy to liquify than compress.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

This makes hydrogen even more expensive and pushes it further into niches which need maximum range at any cost.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Renewable h2 can be cheaper than gasoline or kerosene. Even with liquifaction. Has to use behind the meter or wholesale renewables instead of fixed utility pricing with transmission costs.

Planes typically spend 100x in fuel over lifetime compared to price of plane

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

Where are you finding this cheap renewable H2?

Or is this a theoretical future development?

[-] EldritchFeminity 1 points 1 month ago

I'm assuming the concept they're thinking of goes something like: Using renewable energy like solar and wind to convert water (or some other source of H2) into liquid H2 for the increased energy density compared to charging lithium batteries or equivalent with those same renewables.

There'd be tons of energy loss along the way, but since renewables are effectively "free energy," I can see that it would work in theory.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Right, hydrogen only makes economic sense if the fuel is free because the whole system efficiency stinks compared to BEVs.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Making h2 at less than $2/kg from renewables is achievable today. 300 bar at $2. Lh2 at $2.50.

Sales prices are much higher because capacity is still low, and toyota bundles some free to its fcev customers, and sales volumes are low such that a high profit margin is required to pay for filling infrastructure.

$2/kg is equivalent range in a fuel cell compared to 1$/gallon gasoline. That is much less than refinery sales prices of gasoline or diesel.

Consumer prices have chicken vs egg problem.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
194 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

1943 readers
108 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS