153
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] subignition@fedia.io 23 points 3 weeks ago

why can't we build them again? were the blueprints and knowledge lost? deliberately destroyed? genuine question

[-] sprittytinkles@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Because a lot of "Released Engineering Documents" were just engineering notebooks, and each vehicle was different, even the parts that were supposed to be the same. There was a lot of "repair" versus "rework" disposition, and a "Just make it work; it only needs to work once" culture.

Basically, because it was a race against the Russians, and the Russians were winning.

[-] subignition@fedia.io 10 points 3 weeks ago

huh, impressive that we did a (relatively) slapdash job of it and still pulled it off. Thanks for clarifying.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's downright fucking nuts that it all worked and I'm astonished we didn't leave any astronauts on the moon, and Apollo 13 crew made it back.

Apollo 13 is a helluva movie that really exposes how razor-thin everything was.

[-] Bimfred@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

The production lines are shut down and any custom tooling has had its materials reclaimed to make other things. The institutional knowledge, the little bits that never got written down in the blueprints or manufacturing instructions, it's all gone. The people who worked on that rocket and its components are dead or have been working on something else for the last 50 years. How well would you remember some little tidbit of information that you last needed half a lifetime ago?

[-] reverendz@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 weeks ago
[-] egrets@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Some say our attitude should be one of gratitude, like the widows and orphans of old London Town who owe their large pensions to Wernher von Braun.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago

"Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down? That's not my department, " says Wernher von Braun.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Because it is based on obsolete technology. You wouldn't want to build a flight computer with hard-wired (as in literal wires) software, would you? A lot of it would also have to be reverse engineered, to the point where you might as well build a new vehicle.

[-] amon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

You wouldn’t want to build a flight computer with hard-wired (as in literal wires) software

We can use an FPGA for that

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

The software was the thing that was in the wires, not I/O.

The wires would be replaced by FLASH memory.

[-] amon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Wouldn't they use a MROM or something instead, because flash memory can be quite volatile in the extreme conditions?

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

Because tech evolved, we could do better now.

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

because they were insanely expensive

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
153 points (100.0% liked)

SpaceflightMemes

692 readers
31 users here now

A Lemmy analogue to r/SpaceXMasterRace.

Related communities for serious posts and discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS