254
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago

Okay, so what is he doing to Trump proof stuff?

[-] pachrist@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Pardoning Hunter and projecting an air of general, but aloof concern.

[-] beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

He could use his "official acts" granted by the Supreme Circus to rid us once and for all of this turbulent turd. But he won't.

Motherfucker said "Nothing will fundamentally change"

[-] wisely@feddit.org 35 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I read that withdrawing the student loans was actually one of the things. If he hadn't Trump could have used the years long progress to implement his own policies. Now he would have to restart the process over again to make any changes.

He just appointed a bunch of federal judges this week.

He has also just made a new international climate agreement. It can probably be thrown out but it's another thing that would cause a delay. Nothing is going to make anything Trump proof since he controls 3 branches of government and is immune to crimes. It's all stall tactics.

Biden is terrible at marketing the stuff he does. He doesn't do enough and the things he does actually do just gets pushed through without any press. He also publicly shows no fight when things are blocked so it looks like he never even attempted. Still runs things like an old time senator expecting nonbiased journalists to spread the word for him.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

Biden is terrible at marketing the stuff he does. He doesn't do enough and the things he does actually do just gets pushed through without any press. He also publicly shows no fight when things are blocked so it looks like he never even attempted. Still runs things like an old time senator expecting nonbiased journalists to spread the word for him.

Incredibly accurate assessment.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I don't see that. If he had just nutted up to SCOTUS, pulled a Jackson and just said "well shit, here's the thing. MY copy of the law says nothing about large-scale forgiveness or loan modification being the purview of Congress, so I'm just gonna have the DoEd go ahead and discharge all those loans. If YOU want to tell them that they still owe that cash, go right on ahead", I think that would've created a HELL of a lot bigger headache had Trump won - now instead of simply having to tell people "well too bad you have to start paying again", you have to do a LOT more work to notify people that "hey your loans that were forgiven two years ago, we want that money back" and generate a LOT more political ill will in the process.

[-] wisely@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

I thought the supreme Court already ruled on that saying he didn't have the authority? I remember that the lower courts ordered him to halt and not pay out prior to that, while they had just started accepting applications.

The negotiated rulemaking plan B attempt was different.

It's all a mess like everything else in Government. Next year is going to bankrupt people when payments have to resume. Then there are tariffs and trade wars and whatever else. Hope we will be ok.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago

Trying to finally send all the money approved by Congress to Ukraine

[-] Vivendi@lemmy.zip 5 points 20 hours ago

Jaaaaaack

Fucking

Shiiiiiiiiit

[-] nshibj@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

He pardoned a bunch of rich criminals

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
254 points (100.0% liked)

News

23627 readers
2209 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS