view the rest of the comments
Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
There isn't one that does catalog management too.
RawTherapee is OK for RAW editing, but that's all it does. It's a bit slow too at updating when you change things, it'll take like half a second after moving a slider instead of updating right away as you move it.
DigiKam is OK for cataloging, but it's very slow and you have to open photos in external editors, and then RAW edits you do don't show up in DigiKam unless you export to some other format first, it's a huge mess and hassle to use.
Darktable does both, but it's so insanely difficult to use that I gave up after seeing people suggesting really long tutorial videos to learn how to do basic stuff. The photo output from Darktable also never looks right compared to other programs I edit in. It also has the same slowness issue as RawTherapee.
Really? I'm a super-casual Darktable user - like, once or twice a year when I get around to actually doing the (for me) boring post-processing stuff, and I don't find DarkTable confusing or hard.
What sorts of things do you think it does poorly? Maybe I just don't do those things.