466
submitted 3 days ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 59 points 3 days ago

"okay but women not wanting to date men is just overreacting" - a sentiment we see even here on fucking Lemmy.

Fifty different men. He also trained these men how to rape their wives.

[-] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I can't imagine wanting/needing to rape my wife. There are so many layers to that I don't even know where to begin wrapping my brain around it.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I dated a woman who badly wanted me to roleplay raping her. I knew I could never get into it, and if that's what she wants she should be able to have it I guess, so I broke up with her instead.

[-] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I dated one of those long-distance once and it was really fucking weird. We would have phone sex and she would want me to talk about myself raping her. I tried it once or twice and I was so bad at it that she stopped asking me to phone rape her. Last I checked she moved across the country to probably get fake-raped by another internet boyfriend of hers.

[-] gift_of_gab@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

“okay but women not wanting to date men is just overreacting” - a sentiment we see even here on fucking Lemmy.

We've dodged a lot of the usual garbage from Reddit over here, but that one definitely stuck around. The only negative comments I've received on any of my lemmy accounts are guys furious when you point out men are more violent partners. Like they just cannot admit that as a society the 'boys will be boys' mentality was used to allow a lot of awful behaviours like rape. Hell, Revenge of The Nerds has a rape scene in it and people only recently started to speak out against it.

So, sorry for the downvotes, but at least we all know it's a bunch of insecure men. Maybe they'll learn, maybe they won't, but you have allies here in the mean time.

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"okay but women not wanting to date men is just overreacting" - a sentiment we see even here on fucking Lemmy.

I was thinking it really wasn't that bad on here as you described, but I just read some other comments under this post and I was dead wrong. Disappointing.

EDIT: The other comments seem to have been removed

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The irony of people downvoting this... Can't see the forest through the trees. Or more accurately, can't see further than the tips of their dicks.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 24 points 3 days ago

They're still confused why women chose the bear.

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Ya. I'm a man and I'd also 100% choose the bear.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Misandry is ok but misogyny isn't?

And ya'll wonder why people think there's a double-standard...

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

You're in a thread about a woman who was raped by over 50 different men, and all you're concerned with is "WhAt AbOuT tHe MeN!?!?!".

Crawl out of your own asshole please.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Err... this comment chain was literally started due to misandry.

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

1 in 5 women in the US are raped at some point in their lives. It's not misandry to avoid men when there's a 20% chance you'll be raped. That's just good sense.

Unhappy with that? Work to create a safer society for women, instead of trolling a post about a woman who was raped hundreds of times by fifty different men.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, I've heard the same thing about why it's acceptable to be afraid of certain minorities because they "statistically commit more crimes."

Neither are excuses for bigotry and prejudice.

[-] petrol_sniff_king 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

^
White people becoming black the moment a woman refuses an open-top drink just sitting on a table at a party.

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

What an absurdly bad faith argument to make. I assume you're trying to get me to write several paragraphs explaining why it's so damn stupid just so you can reply with a one word gatcha or something.

Anyways, eat shit incel.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I'll take your pivot to personal insults as admittance that you have no counter-argument.

Not surprised.

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I'll take your pivot to a well known misleading and unrelated statistic with no comparable qualities aside from both being a statistic as admittance that you have no counter-argument.

Not surprised.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, anything to avoid admitting you don't have a point.

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I already made my point? Society at large doesn't take sexual assault seriously, as evidenced by many factors such as lack of police response, hostile judicial systems, health insurance companies not covering rape kits, the existence of manosphere pieces of shit like the Tates, America recently electing an adjudicated rapist to the highest office of the country, the misogynistic teachings of all major religions, the misogynistic practices of all right-wing political ideologies, etc... Women face a harsh reality where they're forced to protect themselves.

Even here, in a post about a woman raped by over fifty men hundreds of times, you're shrieking "BuT WhUt AbOuT MEnS FeEliNgS".

So, what exactly is your point? Women should just swallow all of these fears and concerns? Why? To spare men any sort of introspection and emotional discomfort? Just deal with it ladies, you're gonna get raped, big deal.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You didn't make your point. You said you weren't going to make your point and then proceeded to personally insult me.

You still haven't explained why prejudice isn't acceptable for racists but it is acceptable for misandrists.

So, what exactly is your point?

Did... did you see the part where I said "neither are an excuse for bigotry and prejudice"? Or did you just conveniently ignore that part so you could say I don't have a point?

I've made it clear from the very beginning: misandry isn't acceptable behavior and it's part of a double-standard that you are proudly defending. You got upset about this and proceeded to attack me without explaining why the same arguments racists use to justify their racism are somehow acceptable to justify your sexism.

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Rofl, can you point to the prejudice and/or bigotry? Nobody is suggesting we deny service to men, remove men's civil rights, or do literally anything to men. All your rights and liberties are fully intact. Women being cautious, scared and wary of men because they fear for their safety is not bigotry, prejudice, or sexism. It's a rational and direct response to society's complete and utter failure to protect them, and even further, society's active efforts to protect the rapists and punish the victims.

We're all in here talking about protecting women in a world where way too many people think rape is perfectly acceptable, and you're in the back shouting "but how do we protect the men!?" and you genuinely don't see a problem with that. Jesus Christ. Men are protected, it's women who are vulnerable.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago

If you need me to spell out why judging somebody before you know them based on their sex is prejudiced and sexist, then you need to look up what the definitions of those words mean.

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Nobody is prejudging anyone. It's risk mitigation. I don't lock my doors at night because I'm prejudiced or bigoted towards my neighbors. I lock them because there's a non zero statistical chance that someone might try to break in. Do you not understand what risk management means? Then you need to look up what the definitions of those words mean.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Nobody is prejudging anyone. It’s risk mitigation.

Yeah, the racists say the same thing about avoiding minorities.

It's clear you're never going to accept your bigotry.

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

It's clear you're a misogynistic incel that thinks you deserve access to a woman's body against her will :). Thanks for the self report.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Back to the personal attacks.

Anything to avoid admitting you're part of the problem.

[-] petrol_sniff_king 2 points 1 day ago

You still haven't explained why prejudice isn't acceptable for racists but it is acceptable for misandrists.

Because a black person being wary of confederate-flag-carrying white men actually is acceptable, and you'd know that if your red pill was as good as my ecstacy.

Your hurt feelings are not the denial of your right to vote.

Your hurt feelings are not the revocation of Roe v. Wade.

Your hurt feelings are not workplace sexual harassment.

Your hurt feelings are not rohypnol being slipped into your drink.

Your hurt feelings are not dick pics being sent by someone twice your age.

Your hurt feelings are not your boyfriend hyperventillating because you have 3 exes.

And why are your feelings hurt anyway? Were you one of these fifty men in France? Then suck it up. You are embarrassing to my country of men.

[-] gift_of_gab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Well they replied to a different account so either they're both you or you grossly misread what they were replying to.

[-] petrol_sniff_king 5 points 2 days ago

Where'd you learn that word. That's not in the Bible.

[-] Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you dictate such a profound life decision based on some bizarre cause célèbre, you are overreacting. If you just make reactionary comments on the Internet, sure, carry on.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure what you're trying to say

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 3 days ago

When we were dating I told my to be wife she should not trust any man even me.

[-] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 3 days ago

Personally, I have raped exactly the number of women in my life that I have wanted to. 0.

Just because you are a man, it does not automatically make you untrustworthy, but it is prudent to exercise caution with all people in general—we are unpredictable apes.

[-] prole 3 points 2 days ago

People are definitely shit, in general, but we shouldn't ignore statistics because of that. Men are awful. We're the worst.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 3 days ago

yeah I have since amended to really just people in general. Another thing people need to remember is that unfortunately people tend to be screwed by the people closest to them. We are a sad little species.

[-] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago

We are a normal species. It is not unusual for animals to pick on the weak—just look at how many mammals eat the runt of the litter.

The lesson, I believe, is to take your own protection seriously, and not underestimate the potential of people around you due to familiarity. Hope for the best, be prepared for the worst.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 3 days ago

yeah the last sentence is perfect.

this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
466 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39356 readers
2056 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS