397
submitted 3 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Summary

Proposed amendments to Iraq’s Personal Status Law could allow girls as young as 9 to marry, sparking outrage from rights groups and survivors like “Batta,” who endured abuse after being forced into marriage at 11.

The changes would shift decision-making power to clerics, undermining existing protections for women and children established in 1959.

Supporters claim the amendments promote family values, but critics call them a violation of children’s rights and a step toward legalized child abuse.

Activists and lawmakers are working to block the controversial proposal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Were illegal marriages a thing when Saddam was still in charge, or were legislation proposals with any ambiguity about passing a thing when Saddam was still in charge?

Yes. No. Respectively.

Great JAQing off about a dictator who gouged out children's eyes.

For those wondering about the issue of child marriage in Iraq before the modern day who aren't perpetual apologists for whatever fascists they can find to drool over,

“I lost my life the day my marriage began. I was 13, and the man I had to marry was 20 years older than me.” Shaima’s story is one told only within the intimacy of a home. Nestled on the couch of a modest yet tastefully decorated living room, she sips her Turkish coffee, ensuring there are enough grounds left to read her fortune in search of signs of better days. She smokes cigarette after cigarette, taking a long drag before exhaling as if symbolically releasing her life story.

Born in 1977 in a village near Basra in southern Iraq, Shaima was the eldest of nine siblings raised amid the violence of the 1980s Iran-Iraq War. It was a childhood “with just enough money to buy bread each day, nothing more,” she recalled. “My father sold me to the brother of one of his friends. I didn’t want to marry him; he was too old, violent, and always angry. But I couldn’t refuse.” From this forced marriage came five children. “I had my first child at 14. I was so young and exhausted that one day, I fell asleep while breastfeeding my baby girl. She suffocated and died.” The silence that followed the confession is crushing.

https://international.la-croix.com/world/in-iraq-activists-fight-against-potential-return-of-child-marriages

[-] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I don't know why you have to be so hostile over a genuine question.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

What hostility? Don't "just ask questions" if you're not man enough for the answer.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What hostility?

JAQing off about a dictator

perpetual apologists for whatever fascists they can find to drool over

Yeah, what hostility? 🙄

Then you add in some dumb shit about being "man enough" without a shred of self-awareness. Are you trolling or are you genuinely like this? Note that PugJesus has yet to show where I was "just asking questions" ever, but don't let that get in the way of your cheerleading for his baseless accusations.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Because you have a pattern of 'just asking questions' on every fascist cunt who comes up? I apologize for having a basic sense of pattern recognition.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Who else did I ask questions about?

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Oh, is this going to be like the last time you played dumb as to your past statements, and then when I brought receipts you went silent on the topic and proceeded to waste my fucking time? If it is, I'd at least like to know beforehand.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You certainly have a wild imagination because if you're referring to the time I think you are, the last time you brought "receipts" it was you linking to posts of mine not containing anything you claimed I wrote. I don't know why you're so angry at me, but perhaps you would be better able to read my posts and not hallucinate patterns if you weren't in a blind rage.

It really is unfortunate because I appreciate the information you gave in your initial response, but the hostility was so off-putting.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You certainly have a wild imagination because if you’re referring to the time I think you are, the last time you brought “receipts” it was you linking to posts of mine not containing anything you claimed I wrote.

Fucking lol

Maybe stop cheerleading atrocities and fascists if you can't even keep track of how often you fucking do it.

It really is unfortunate because I appreciate the information you gave in your initial response, but the hostility was so off-putting.

Oh, I'm sorry that I was rude to you when all you were doing was trying to play your usual "Amerikkka Bad" card by whitewashing a dictator who tortured and murdered on a literally genocidal scale. You know, not unlike what you do with Assad? Would you like to play apologist for the Taliban next? I know you're just drooling over the possibility.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I don't know what you think that link is supposed to show, but you'd have to be on something powerful to think me saying democrats should try to stop the genocide instead of sending billions in support is somehow me "cheerleading atrocities".

I still don't know what I did to piss you off so much, but apparently you're so angry that you've built a whole strawman of me and you've just been fighting with that strawman this entire time. Have fun with that, hope it helps you relieve stress.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
397 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39332 readers
2040 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS