284

China announced Tuesday it is banning exports to the United States of gallium, germanium, antimony and other key high-tech materials with potential military applications, as a general principle, lashing back at U.S. limits on semiconductor-related exports. 

The Chinese Commerce Ministry announced the move after the Washington expanded its list of Chinese companies subject to export controls on computer chip-making equipment, software and high-bandwidth memory chips. Such chips are needed for advanced applications. 

The ratcheting up of trade restrictions comes as President-elect Donald Trump has been threatening to sharply raise tariffs on imports from China and other countries, potentially intensifyi

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 60 points 2 weeks ago

More on gallium and its uses:

https://techiescientist.com/uses-of-gallium/

AP did not attempt to explain why all of these rare and exotic minerals and metals and compounds are used in manufacturing...

...because there a bunch of them, explaining all the reasons for using just one of them would basically be the equivalent of a crash course in applied chemistry / manufacturing / physics / engineering, and if you want to get into why these materials are used in lieu of others, well throw logistics and economics into that pile of course work as well.

AP is reporting the news, not being an industry specific journal, or a comprehensive policy impact study.

I agree with you that it was a frustrating read... but having worked as a copy editor, and having provided many different executive reports to various businesses and non profits, I also sympathize with the writer.

This is the kind of topic where you can either do a broad level overview, or you can write a tome for those who really want to dive into all the details to fully understand it... there's no effective way to do a middling approach on such a vast and complex topic.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Fair enough, that makes sense.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 weeks ago

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1445285/gallium-share-of-production-worldwide-by-country/

As of 2022, China basically produces all (98.4%) of the world's gallium.

... Statista has much more great info, but unless you want to pay for a subscription or spend a day hopping through proxy IPs... yeah, good luck.

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 18 points 2 weeks ago

The previous article says: "The largest global producers of gallium are Russia, Germany, Australia, and France. "

Ok, looking at this: https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/energie/china-seltene-metalle-100.html

I can see that the reason China became this huge producer is because everyone else decided to stop and by from them instead, though that doesn't mean they can only rely on China for it.

But indeed it is now the largest gallium and germanium producer.

And Gallium is combined to make late-factorio stuff, so him who controls the Gallium, controls the future.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

late-factorio stuff

That's how we're saying 'high-tech' now?

...fine, I dig it

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

They produce 98% percent of low-purity Gallium. We produce plenty of high purity Gallium, and Gallium, like Germanium, comes from Zinc mining. Which we still do plenty of in the US. So if we need more high quality Gallium, it's not going to be hard to get.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ah, so it's not a matter of "that's where the gallium is", it's "might as well buy it from China if they're sellin' it", same as the dollar store

Edit: I wouldn't be surprised if the places in the US producing high-quality gallium are using poor-quality Chinese gallium as feedstock though.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They are, but we have plenty of Zinc mining we can get it from ourselves. It's just an economics matter, so we'd subsidize that. We only use enough to fill one truck load per year. So it's likely we'd just get a defense contractor to do it and subsidize it

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

I will add that this isn't really that huge of a deal:

https://cybernews.com/editorial/gallium-germanium-semiconductor-alternatives/

The US and any other developed country can produce it, they just choose not to since the demand isn't that economical to go out of your way to mass produce:

A single truck could carry all the gallium that the US reportedly consumes each year. Most of the 18 tons of silvery metal are imported from China, the world's largest producer.

(From the article I linked)

Not enough for a business to specialize in the material. But, seeing as the US does produce a lot of zinc and aluminum and it can be refined as a byproduct of those materials, I won't be surprised if a company steps up to fill the gap after awhile.

Really, just read the article I linked. It gives a good rundown on all this plus the germanium. Ultimately, this isn't that big of a deal for the US.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

That article isn't great in the way that it considers GaAs wafers separately, as if Chinese export controls won't touch GaAs wafers, whereas the Chinese announcement specifies anything that might be used by the US military industrial complex containing Ga may be targeted.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It doesn't consider them separately, the article I linked specifically mentions that the GaAs wafers would be impacted and presents a bigger impact. That doesn't take away the core point that China is the main producer because it's not that profitable. Other countries, including the US, can easily step in and begin refining Ga and Ge as necessary.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

If it became an issue we would over pay Raytheon to refine it.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

In my personal experience, even wholly within a professional domain when an expert is trying to give an overview to non-experts (for example to mid-level managers for the purpose of decision making) a lot of things end up having to be axioms (i.e. "trust me this is how it works/this is what's needed/this is how its done" as fully trying to explained things to them would requires explanations of the explanations of the explanations.

This is with same-industry expert-domain-adjacent professionals, so I can see how much worse it would be when explaining stuff to average whose understanding of an industry is zero.

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
284 points (100.0% liked)

News

23616 readers
2962 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS