444
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Donald Trump plans to ban transgender individuals from military service shortly after his inauguration, reversing President Biden’s 2021 policy and expelling about 15,000 serving trans troops.

Critics, including advocacy groups and military experts, warn this move will exacerbate recruitment and retention challenges, harm unit cohesion, and create skill gaps amid existing shortfalls.

The order aligns with Trump’s broader anti-trans agenda, which includes banning gender-affirming care and restricting trans rights nationwide.

Legal challenges are anticipated as the military faces administrative and operational disruptions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pechente@feddit.org 83 points 3 weeks ago

Seriously, pretty much all people I‘ve met who are offended by LGBTQ people have either suppressed desires or are really insecure about their own sexuality in some way.

It’s like that Hungarian minister who constantly attacked gay people until he was found by police at an illegal gay orgy in Brussels (illegal since it was during Covid lockdowns).

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 56 points 3 weeks ago

Let's not overshadow the fact that people DO hate us just because they need someone to hate, or because their religion says to, or because their politics says to. Trying to pretty it up or make it "less bad" because they're all secretly gay doesn't help.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I detest the "all homophobes are secretly gay" thing so much.

What it's saying, in effect, is that queer people are responsible for our own oppression. Because if every homophobe is secretly queer, then no straight person can ever be homophobic. If they were, they wouldn't be straight, by definition.

The only way that argument works is if we're actually arguing that there is no such as being straight, and that everyone is at least 1% bisexual. There's some basis for that, especially in studies of ancient cultures and uncontacted tribes. But until we start taking that seriously as an idea (and that is a very, very contentious idea to be taking seriously), this "Only queer people can be homophobic" nonsense has got to stop.

[-] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

One percent seems too low considering John Barrowman exists.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't think anybody thinks that only queer folk can be homophobic, but it does happen quite often. Usually it's the fault of heteronormative indoctrination, religious or otherwise (which is also usually the problem when straight folk are homophobic)

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 weeks ago

That doesn't make it less bad, it makes it more bad.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

There's also some women that were so traumatised by experience with men that they are afraid trans women will attack women, and creeps will claim they are trans to elude punishment. I think this is a real problem, but much rarer than it may seem, and it's not a good enough reason to say that trans women don't/shouldn't exist. Maybe it's because I'm too privileged to understand

[-] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

Please provide a source to 1 instance in the history of the world where an abuser used cross-dressing as the primary way to gain access to his victims...we'll wait.

Yes, people are scared of this. But, only bc GOP leaders tell them to be. It's a made up fear that cannot be legitimized like you are trying to do

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not trying to legitimise anything, but when I try to convince such people, I usually fail, that's why I brought it up. Yes it's weaponising fear and it's the same irrational beliefs that make people racist or nazi, and a lot of other things, I think

Regarding the sources, I think it's stories like this or this that makes them worry, don't know if sources are credible, first one looks pretty fake.

nitpickbesides, I didn't say

used cross-dressing as the primary way

it can be opportunistic, not modus operandi, I only think that this is realistic because statistically speaking there are enough abusers on the planet so that at least some could try doing that

[-] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Which cis woman was traumatized in either of those articles?

this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
444 points (100.0% liked)

News

23627 readers
2770 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS