145
submitted 19 hours ago by solo@slrpnk.net to c/world@lemmy.world

The administration claimed that blocking arms transfers would embolden Hamas — ignoring Israel’s genocidal slaughter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 33 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

What is the argument here?

We cant stop giving weapons of mass destruction to this genocidal terrorist government, because otherwise this much smaller terrorist group may commit slightly bigger but still comparably very small acts of terror?

They try to make a point that its pressure so hamas releases hostages ignoring the fact that this war itself is embolstering support for hamas as freedom fighters against the tyrannical israel. They want the US to give weapons to Israel because it helps their propaganda.

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 17 hours ago

What hostages? Does anyone really think there are any left alive and not either killed by Israeli bombs, starvation or straight up knifed by hamas out of anger/frustration/convenience?

[-] xor 7 points 17 hours ago

I mean I'm inclined to believe so, given both hamas and Israel claim it's the case

Hamas are incentivised to not kill them arbitrarily (or put them at risk of being killed in Israeli strikes) because it's their primary bargaining chip, and Israel are incentivised to avoid targeting them for political reasons

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 17 hours ago

Yeah but you'll notice the first two methods of hostage death I mentioned would not require Israel to have targeted them, but would be natural outcomes for how they are conducting their military actions.

[-] xor 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Sure, but you'll notice I explicitly referenced that when I said hamas is incentivised to minimise risk of them being hit by Israeli strikes, especially by keeping them separately in members' homes and in tunnels. The same goes for starvation, in that, if at all possible, hamas actively wants to keep them fed enough to survive, where that isn't at the cost of starving to death themselves.

You're right that some/many (maybe even most, I have no data wrt specific numbers) of the hostages have, and will continue to die due to Israel's actions, but that's significantly different from your initial claim of "every single hostage is dead"

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago

What hostages? I always just figured this was a no hostage return we never stop full well knowing there’s no longer hostages to return.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
145 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39082 readers
2641 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS