380

The measure received 14 votes in favour, with the US the sole member to reject it. However, because the US is a permanent member of the council, it has the ability to veto any resolution brought forward

Unlike several previous resolutions regarding a ceasefire in Gaza, Wednesday's measure was brought forward by all 10 elected members of the Security Council.

The US has vetoed four previous attempts at calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, on most occasions being the lone vote against the measures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago

It's a fucking genocide. Stop the killing sort the hostages after.

[-] maplebar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

sort the hostages after.

"Sort" the hostages "after" what?

So in your imagination Israel unilaterally stops fighting against Hamas while (a) Hamas continues to hold civilians hostage, doing all manners of physical and psychological torture to people who only happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and (b) Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and tribal gangs continue to wage attacks against Israel? And then (and only then), Israel comes back to the negotiating table with Hamas once again for yet another round of negotiations to try to free the hostages, only for Hamas to decide to move the goalposts?

Is this really the type of illogical nonsense people here believe in?

No wonder this shit has been going on for decades... Y'all have lost your damn minds if you think that the world works this way.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Stop the genocide. Stop the killing of innocent civilians. Now.

Then, reach a deal for the hostages, like the ones Netanyahu has repeatedly shot down.

Then, end the occupation: get Israel the fuck out of Gaza, the fuck out of the West Bank, the fuck out of East Jerusalem, back to their 1967 borders.

Or, if you don't think this is realistic (and it isn't because with almost a million settlers, the Israeli right has destroyed the material conditions required for the 2 state solution) prefer cleaner solutions, end Jewish supremacy in Greater Israel (Israel+West Bank+Gaza+Golan+Shebaa). One state, one democracy, equal rights for everyone.

Persecute all war criminals, Israeli and Palestinian. Then run a truth and reconciliation process, with reparations.

Justice, right? Crazy, I know. Illogical shit.

Here's the catch: without justice there will be no peace. Enjoy your endless cycle of violence.

[-] maplebar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

There is no "justice" in any circumstances in which the hostages are not immediately returned.

Then, reach a deal for the hostages, like the ones Netanyahu has repeatedly shot down.

So you're literally just confirming this:

So in your imagination Israel unilaterally stops fighting against Hamas while (a) Hamas continues to hold civilians hostage, doing all manners of physical and psychological torture to people who only happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and (b) Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and tribal gangs continue to wage attacks against Israel? And then (and only then), Israel comes back to the negotiating table with Hamas once again for yet another round of negotiations to try to free the hostages, only for Hamas to decide to move the goalposts?

You must have read "Art of the Deal".

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 19 points 1 week ago

Yes this totally all makes a genocide completely reasonable and acceptable. Genociding the local population, that's true justice innit?

[-] maplebar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If you could argue against what I said you wouldn't resort to putting words in my mouth, mate.

And if you could read you would know that both Israelies and Palestinians are the "local population" with somewhat dubious historic claims over the land spanning back >3000 years.

Need I remind you that it was the British that drew the maps that have lead us to where we are today?

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Explain why Israeli lives matter more than Palestinian lives. Like, be precise.

[-] maplebar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Who said they are? Only you so far.

You should be more precise with your weird, non sequitur questions.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

You keep only talking about 97 Israelis when tens of thousands of Palestinians are dead and countless other are maimed, injured, starved, disposessed. You obviously value those 97 lives more than any of that. Explain why.

[-] maplebar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's cynical and frankly fucking disgusting that you view human lives as nothing more than numbers.

Is this just numbers to you? Is that how you quantify the value of human life?

If so, you are beyond help and reasoning.

Nothing can be done for the thousands of people on both sides of this conflict who have been tragically killed in a pointless war, but that does no mean that the people who can be saved right now, today, shouldn't be. I want the immediate release of the hostages, because 1 innocent person taken hostage and tortured for months in an injustice to people everywhere. I want a ceasefire because 1 innocent person killed in a pointless holy war is an injustice to people everywhere.

The real question, and the one to which I can only guess your disgusting answer, is why you don't...

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Two scenarios for what happens TONIGHT.

Scenario 1, no ceasefire: the genocide continues, several Palestinians die tonight. The hostages remain hostages. No chance of release. They might get bombed by mistake even.

Scenario 2, no-deal ceasefire: genocide ends, no Palestinians die tonight. The hostages remain hostages. No chance of them being killed by mistake. A chance for a political settlement where they get released.

Do you see the fucking difference?

[-] maplebar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Scenario 3, hostages freed as part of ceasefire deal: fighting stops, hostages freed.

You wouldn't think it was acceptable that "the hostages remain hostages" if they were people you cared about. Do you not see the fucking difference?

The scenario that will ultimately win is Scenario 1, the hostages will not be released and the war will continue. It'll only get worse when Trump gets into office, so sit back and enjoy existing in the calm before the storm.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Israel can enact Scenario 2 unilaterally, immediately, tonight, regardless of what Hamas thinks, wants, or does. Tonight. Right now. EDIT: And before you smarmily say that Hamas can also release the hostages unilaterly, a reminder that Israel is conducting a genocide (the generals' plan) in Northern Gaza, regardless of what Hamas does. EDIT2: And also let's not forget that Israel makes claims of being a democratic western country, whereas Hamas is a totalitarian islamist bag of shits. So no, they are not the fucking same.

You keep putting hostages being ALIVE hostages above Palestinian kids being DEAD kids.

And by the fucking way, my dude, Israel is holding thousands of Palestinian hostages as well. Anything to say about those? Ostensibly, the only rational part of Sinwar's otherwise deranged "masterplan" was to do a hostage exchange. Do Palestinian hostages matter to you, my dude? Any pearl clutching for the kids in "administrative detention" or "convicted" by IDF military kangaroo courts with 99% conviction rates?

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
380 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39165 readers
1711 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS