571
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

What apple wants or doesnt want to do is completely irrelevant. The fact that they have the ability to remotely modify your device is a disqualifying factor for any rational person thinking about risk of life level privacy.

Also they can be legally forced to put backdoors into their software while, under the threat of state violence, being prohibited from telling the public about it. Thats how the US legal system works.

They can also be forced to put on a theater to make it look like they are not giving the feds access btw.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

How can Apple remotely modify your device? Software updates? They have no access to your data.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Correct, forced software updates i.e. remotely modifying your device. Also what makes you think they have no access to your data already? Do just trust them when they say "we promise uwu" ?

Also phones can be caught during shipping and modified, thats how the feds did it for one of their more recent big drug operations. Under Trump who fucking knows what justifications will be used to do the most vile shit.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Updates aren’t forced. You have the ability to enable automatic updates, but they are turned off by default. They also cannot affect user data. iOS and app software is sandboxed. The kernel keeps application and OS layers independent, just like Linux. User data is stored in a separate partition.

Apple users will experience the same thing that all other computer owners experience when they disable updates entirely; outdated security software and limited compatibility.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Brother in christ, how hard is this to understand.

Updates aren’t forced

How do you know? Have you checked the code that runs the updates? Just because the phone usually gives you the option to postpone regular updates doesnt mean that they cant be forced.

They also cannot affect user data.

What makes you believe that? Did you write the software that keeps it sandboxed?

Do people just believe anything that companies claim? If we could believe the things that companies claim, then the world would be a much nicer place but its not.

If its not proven, then its not the case as far as anyone should be concerned. Do we believe in religion now because the pope says that god is real?

And i havent even talked about code quality. Nobody can verify how well designed their software is. It could be a complete shitfest filled with old and insecure code that nobody does any auditing on.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Yes. I worked for Apple for over a decade.

You could be Tim Cook and i would still not believe a word out of your mouth.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

You don’t have to. Opinions are subjective, and you’re entitled to believe whatever you’d like.

That still doesn’t mean you’re correct.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever.

Edit: I would be very happy if you could use your apple employee access to leak the source code ofcourse :)

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable.

That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven.

At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M.

Get real.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Their opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it's skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach.

[-] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Updates aren’t forced.

No. Apple claims updates aren't forced. With proprietary software, we have no way to verify if they have some way of forcing an update through.

You have the ability to enable automatic updates, but they are turned off by default.

No. Apple claims that only the user can enable automatic updates. With proprietary software, we have no way to verify if Apple can enable them remotely.

Also, are you really going tell users to not update?

They also cannot affect user data. iOS and app software is sandboxed. The kernel keeps application and OS layers independent, just like Linux.

No. Apple claims that updates cannot affect user data. Again, with proprietary software, there is no way to truly verify.

Apple users will experience the same thing that all other computer owners experience when they disable updates entirely; outdated security software and limited compatibility.

Oh...so updates are good now, and we should update, even if it puts us at risk of something malicious?

You are taking Apple's claims as truth and pretending they are good. They probably aren't.

But, as someone else mentioned in the thread: The US government can force companies to spy for them. Even if Apple was as good as they market themselves to be, they cannot outrun the government.

Now, it's not realistic to force everybody to switch away from iPhones. But, we should stop treating proprietary software as truly trustworthy with our data.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
571 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

1213 readers
57 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS