submitted 10 months ago by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/techtakes@awful.systems

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They apparently copied without attribution in a manner that was a violation? I'm still looking for precise wording of the PEL.

It's very hard to violate the Apache license, but these are the sort of bozos who could manage it.

EDIT: Here is the PEL. It lacks the attribution requirements of section 4 of the Apache Licence 2.0. So yeah, they managed it.

This is a small technical violation that's easily remedied, but I understand that's what got people pissed off.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024

61 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2096 readers

79 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS