727
Capitalism rule (slrpnk.net)
submitted 4 months ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] will_steal_your_username 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Tankie is not synonymous with socialist/communist.

Edit: and neither is criticizing capitalism

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah thats fine but federated instances are absolutely writhing with tankies who will use sentiments like this to encourage subterfuge and spread propoganda.

[-] VeganCheesecake 19 points 4 months ago

I feel like if you react to any left-wing posts like a you're the main role in a 50's red scare propaganda video, they've already won.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Thats the same logic people use to say wokeness empowers nazis.

[-] kittenzrulz123 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No it makes sense, this post mentions the corruption of the legal system and how wage labor results in the capitalist class having all the power while producing none of the labor. How is that in any way linked with authoritarianism or military action?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The part where authoritarians claims to oppose capitalism. There are bad actors who claim the opposite of the outcome of their actions. Thats the nuance of this situation.

[-] kittenzrulz123 4 points 4 months ago

Still seems strange to comment here, I mean thats a valid argument but this doesn't seem like the right place.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

This is literally a place that explicitly bans tankies. It's the place for sure.

[-] kittenzrulz123 2 points 4 months ago

No I mean specifically this post

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

This post is literally in a place that explicitly bans tankies. It’s the place for sure.

[-] kittenzrulz123 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah that doesn't mean every slightly left wing post is authoritarian, that just comes off as far too accusatory. Shocking news, actual leftists exist on this instance.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I never said the post was improper, I just said be careful and then asked a question that sorts the wheat from the chaff.

[-] kittenzrulz123 2 points 4 months ago

A better question would be do the workers need a vanguard/vanguard party and if so how much power should they hold. Meanwhile opposing Nato is universal for pacifists.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Opposing the world's largest mutual defense pact is "universal for pacifists"...?

Bro lmfao

[-] kittenzrulz123 2 points 4 months ago

That relies on the idea that the global north needs protection from the global south, nato has committed some of the worse atrocities ever committed.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

This is why it's such a great test, people really cannot help by tell on themselves like this.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Maybe capitalism should have made sure we didn't need 2-3 jobs all at 40 hours a week just to pay rent and groceries. Buying a home? Forget it.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Are you replying to the wrong person?

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

No, propaganda and subterfuge are less effective against a populace who has their needs met and live comfortably. Capitalism no longer does this for anyone but the wealthy.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Okay but like I never made any statements in favor of capitalism. I just called Tankies a bunch of shitheads.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

You really cannot extrapolate

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Theres extrapolation and then theres you having an unrelated discussion and projecting your imaginary opponent onto me.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

We're on a post about capitalism. If this is too much for you, perhaps the puddle of drool before you would be more accommodating.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I never said the post was wrong in any way, I offered valuable advice to OP and other users here.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

And I was saying people have a real reason to be disenfranchised and its not all propaganda.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Okay thats fine, the fuck does that have to do with my response to this post?

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
727 points (100.0% liked)

196

16889 readers
521 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS