1245
submitted 1 year ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bleistift2@feddit.de 132 points 1 year ago

What the actual fuck⁈ “Batteries can catch on fire.” Sure, whatever could go wrong with a 1000l tank of FUCKING GASOLINE.

AAAaaaaHHhh I hate people!

[-] mriguy@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Going with the “batteries catch on fire argument” is stupid. “Batteries are heavy and expensive” is probably more compelling. But yeah, wires are better solution for things going in fixed routes.

[-] SinJab0n@mujico.org 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The ammount of water required to put out a normal car is infinitely less than the amount required to put out a battery fire.

Not to mention the extra weight, nor the retention loss per recharge meaning we need to change batteries every 2-4 years polluting a lot more, we ain't even talking about the energy loss when doing the conversion to electric and then again to mechanical.

The electric transport is the way to go in the future, but firts it needs to have a solid foundation, and nuclear is the way to go at least in this moment. Otherwise we are only making things worse.

Edit for those wondering about the battery degradation: https://www.geotab.com/blog/ev-battery-health/

[-] riskable@programming.dev 23 points 1 year ago

we need to change batteries every 2-4 years

Wait, what‽ No. We don't need to change batteries every 2-4 years. That's what you do with TV remote controls and temperature sensors, not electric car batteries, LOL!

Electric car batteries are made to last at least 7 years (from a warranty standpoint) but in reality it's more like 10. Not only that but they're not single, gigantic objects. They're made of lots of "cells" so if one of them is going bad you can replace just that one bad cell.

Anecdote: The batteries in my Prius lasted 15 years before I had to replace one of the cells. Then a year later I had to replace another one. A year after that I sold it so I have no idea how the batteries are doing right now but I'm sure another cell would probably need to be replaced by now 19 years in service).

I'd also like to point out that the latest electric car batteries are vastly superior to the ones in my Prius.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah, what I've heard is that water cooling the batteries (like almost every EV does now) massively extends the life. Early Prius batteries had no cooling and the heat degraded them faster. 15 years is a pretty good life still.

On the subject of battery warranty:

The federal government requires manufacturers to offer an eight-year/100,000-mile warranty on all EV batteries. California does one better, mandating a warranty of 10 years or 150,000 miles. Some companies will cover a battery only if it completely stops working, while others will replace the battery if it falls below a certain capacity, usually 70% of the original, while still under warranty.

It's important to note, a degraded battery, even with 50% of its original capacity is still useful. Someone who doesn't need the range could drive it, or the battery could be taken apart, and have the cells repurposed or recycled. Lithium and some of the other rare metals used in batteries are quite valuable for recycling, and our abilities to do so are getting better every year.

[-] MDKAOD@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Electric car batteries are made to last at least 7 years (from a warranty standpoint) but in reality it’s more like 10. Not only that but they’re not single, gigantic objects. They’re made of lots of “cells” so if one of them is going bad you can replace just that one bad cell.

Sincere question, what happens with the second hand electric vehicle market? New electrics make a ton of sense, but in my mind the 'used car' market becomes essentially unobtainable for poor folk. If a 12 year old electric vehicle hits the market, eventually the second or third owner is going to have to replace the batteries and poor people can't afford the 5000 plus labor to get new cells for it.

This isn't a situation that affects me, at the moment, but there are millions of people around the globe who buy the $1000 car and drive it until it just doesn't go anymore. I don't see that being an option for electrics.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sincere question, what happens with the second hand electric vehicle market?

Doesn't and won't exist. And it might be a "conspiracy theory" but I do think it is totally intentional.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Sure, that replacement time isn't 4 but 15-20 years (well, except early Leafs that didn't have battery temperature management of any kind), but my 20 year old car's gas tank fits just as much gas as it did 20 years ago.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

If you think any ICE car is going to outlast an electric you're mistaken. EVs have a fraction of the moving parts of an ICE car and as a result are expected to last a lot longer. 30+ years for an electric car isn't out of the question. Especially the latest ones with their water cooled batteries.

The number of moving parts is just one (albeit a great big) factor as to why EVs are a lot more reliable and will last a lot longer than an ICE car. There's other elements as well such as the regenerative braking... You basically have an expiration date that tells you when to replace the brake pads instead of a number of miles (or thickness). Because the brake pads themselves will never wear enough from normal driving to warrant replacement. Instead you have to figure out the replacement time based on exposure to natural radiation (LOL) and seasonal hot/cold cycles.

The magnets in the motors lose about 5% of their strength every 100 years. So again, the thing you're accounting for when figuring out how long the motors will last is the exposure to natural radiation degrading the insulation of the wires (LOL).

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm aware an ICE car requires more maintenance. But, two things. My gas tank doesn't get smaller over time and good luck taking your Tesla or Chevy Bolt to an unauthorized repair shop and let them try to fix anything without access to OEM diagnostic tools. Yes, new ICE cars are also full of this bullshit, but hey, my 20 year old ICE car isn't!

[-] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Good luck finding or affording gas in 20 years!

You'll have to go down to the boat dock to fill up your ICE car because there won't be gas stations anywhere else.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No small thanks to the German government ;)

load more comments (3 replies)

Just remember that "good" solutions are still preferred over "bad" solutions, and there are never any "perfect" solutions. I see too many people think electric cars are terrible because of what they've been told, like the batteries. For me, it's like "Yeah, but they're still better than ICE vehicles". They'll get better, they're definitely not perfect, but they are just better

[-] vimdiesel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

YOu can't really stop a lithium ion battery fire, all you can do is keep it from catching other things on fire around it, you pretty much just have to let it burn out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

and nuclear is the way to go at least in this moment.

Nuclear is about to go away, looking at the statitics.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nuclear is about to go away FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK German government

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] SinJab0n@mujico.org 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah.... not really something I want to see happening.

Ideally solar + nuclear could be the solution we need.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Batpool23@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Yup batteries are not the way. By the time the batteries need to be replaced you might have helped slightly but probably not. Batteries is a illusion to going green right now. Just another product that has a demand and an easy market for it.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I think we're all aware of the costs associated with recycling batteries.

Are you aware of the costs associated with high CO2 levels?

Have to choose the lesser of two evils.

[-] paddytokey@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

What would be a better alternative if you exclude the use of fossil fuels?

[-] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

fixed overhead wires, as OP suggested?

[-] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

You’re aware that diesel is quite hard to catch on fire

[-] Chadus_Maximus@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 year ago

That's why he said gasoline tho

[-] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

But that’s not relevant for busses

[-] Platomus@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

No it's not. It's harder to catch fire than gasoline.

It still catches fire easily.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 6 points 1 year ago

You can toss a lit match into a puddle of diesel and the match will go out. Diesel burns, but since it doesn't evaporate as fast as gasoline, you don't have those flammable gases hanging in the air. A trail of diesel that's being burned at one end will not spread, unlike gasoline.

[-] Platomus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago
[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Gasoline doesn't burn that easily, either. Cars with gas tanks don't burst into flames while sitting powered off in a garage. Even when they get wrecked they don't usually burst into flames.

On the other hand, gasoline is slowly causing the world to burst into flames…

[-] Platomus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well yeah... You need a spark to cause a fire. To have ignition you need oxygen, fuel and a spark.

Nothing burns easily if there's no spark.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Gasoline and diesel can be extinguished relatively easily. Extinguishing an EV means throwing it into a tub of water for a day or two

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Gasoline vehicles also don't tend to catch fire spontaneously while parked. That risk exists with every unattended lithium-ion battery undergoing recharging. People technically shouldn't be plugging their phones in at night and then going to sleep, but everyone does it anyway.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doesn't matter much for phones, but when talking EV charging... Night electricity tends to be cheaper when it's not solar energy season.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Can't wait for miles of 240V extension cords when EU makes even used non EVs illegal. Yes, millions of city dwellers in apartments totally have a garage to charge in.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

There will be solutions by 2050 (the proposed timeframe for having a zero-emissions fleet). For an example, vehicles with combustion engines can still be newly registered after 2035 if they use only CO2-neutral fuels. I think EU would rather ban sale of fossil fuels than ban used cars that can technically burn fossil fuels. If only plant-based fuels are available, it doesn't matter what the cars can technically burn.

The German big 3 are already developing cars that would only run on non-fossil fuels I believe.

Secondly, chargers near apartment buildings and on sidewalks can be added. We have plenty of time.

And I'm sure Germany will water down the regulations even more so in the end, I'm fairly sure they'll consider new MHEVs fine after 2035.

And finally, those who can't charge at home will do so at the charging stations. It's not a huge issue if you have a battery with 500+ km of range. Might be an issue for i-miev and first gen Leaf owners though.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Unless we get mass producable, cheap fuel like CHOOH2, "cars can use co2 neutral fuels" is translation to "in reality no ICE cars for the mass population"

Secondly, chargers near apartment buildings and on sidewalks can be added. We have plenty of time.

And who will pay for those? My town can barely get enough money to maintain street lights, who will install and maintain the charging infrastructure on streets where it will inevitably get destroyed?

And finally, those who can’t charge at home will do so at the charging stations.

Oh yes, so now instead of 15 minute wait at a gas station I will only have to wait 2 hours before a space is available and then 30 minutes to charge, all while thinking "how much is this quick charge degrading my battery"

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

There's 27 years to go till EU's predicted (not required by law) end of ICE cars. There's time to invest, time to innovate and hopefully time for your town to reduce crime and gain more resources.

Also HVO is pretty affordable nowadays. Maybe 20% more than regular diesel fuel at most. It is claimed to be carbon neutral. I'm sure something similar will be developed for otto cycle engines.

Also unless you're planning to use a first gen leaf past the 2050s, quick charging isn't very bad. All modern EVs have battery cooling and will also throttle charging when the temperature rises. The don't full on go 350kW for 20 minutes straight.

Waiting 2 hours is solved by installing more chargers. Clearly a regional issue with fuel pumps as well because I never have to wait over 2-3 minutes.

load more comments (7 replies)

Please don't put lithium in water; that will make it worse.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Tell that to firefighters.

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
1245 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45873 readers
882 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS