258
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] self@awful.systems 10 points 3 months ago

holy shit, imagine getting a second chance to not be a fucking debatelord and doubling down this hard

off you fuck

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 10 points 3 months ago

phallusy fallacy: posting like a cock

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago

People just out here acting like a fundamentally, inextricably unreliable and unethical technology has a "use case"

smdh

[-] self@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago

fucking right! there’s this unearned assumption that just because the tech’s been invented, it must have worth. and, like, no? there’s so many dead ends in science and technology, and notoriously throwing money at something doesn’t change its fundamental nature

and now I’m pissed and trying to decide if it’s even worth explicitly adding “don’t be a debatelord asshole” to the TechTakes sidebar, cause it’s not like they’re gonna stop

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago

"We're not saying it doesn't have its flaws, but you need to appreciate the potential of the radium cockring!"

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 3 months ago

notoriously throwing money at something doesn’t change its fundamental nature

to wildly abword a phrase I've seen elsewhere: "idiocy can remain solvent longer than you can"

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
258 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1489 readers
31 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS