260
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 27 points 1 year ago

I had GPT 3.5 break down 6x 45-minute verbatim interviews into bulleted summaries and it did great. I even asked it to anonymize people’s names and it did that too. I did re-read the summaries to make sure no duplicate info or hallucinations existed and it only needed a couple of corrections.

Beats manually summarizing that info myself.

Maybe their prompt sucks?

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 41 points 1 year ago

“Are you sure you’re holding it correctly?”

christ, every damn time

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

That is how tools tend to work, yes.

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 16 points 1 year ago

we find they tend to post here, though not for long

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 12 points 1 year ago

it makes me feel fucking ancient to find that this dipshit didn't seem to get the remark, and it wasn't even that long ago

[-] istewart@awful.systems 14 points 1 year ago

Jobs is Tech Jesus, but Antennagate is only recorded in one of the apocryphal books

[-] fasterandworse@awful.systems 16 points 1 year ago

"tools" doesn't mean "good"

good tools are designed well enough so it's clear how they are used, held, or what-fucking-ever.

fuck these simpleton takes are a pain in the arse. They're always pushed by these idiots that have based their whole world view on fortune cookie aphorisms

[-] V0ldek@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago

Said like a person who wouldn't be able to correctly hold a hammer on first try

load more comments (13 replies)
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
260 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2239 readers
336 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS